Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Adverse Event Management — Part 1: Overview of Checkpoint Inhibitors and General Principles of irAE Management

Classes of immune checkpoint inhibitors, mechanism and epidemiology of irAEs, CTCAE grading, general management framework, corticosteroid protocols, immunosuppressive escalation, and infusion reactions.

guidelinesMar 2026guidelines

Classes of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are monoclonal antibodies that block inhibitory receptors on T cells or their ligands on tumor cells and antigen-presenting cells. By releasing these “brakes” on the adaptive immune system, ICIs restore T-cell-mediated antitumor immunity. The currently approved classes and agents are summarized below.1 2

Anti-PD-1 (Programmed Death-1) Inhibitors

PD-1 is an inhibitory receptor expressed on activated T cells. Engagement of PD-1 by its ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2 on tumor cells leads to T-cell exhaustion and immune evasion. Anti-PD-1 antibodies block this interaction, restoring T-cell effector function.

AgentTypeApproved Indications (Select)
PembrolizumabHumanized IgG4Melanoma, NSCLC, HNSCC, urothelial carcinoma, MSI-H/dMMR solid tumors, Hodgkin lymphoma, cervical cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, Merkel cell carcinoma, RCC, endometrial cancer, esophageal/GEJ cancer, TNBC, and others
NivolumabFully human IgG4Melanoma, NSCLC, RCC, Hodgkin lymphoma, HNSCC, urothelial carcinoma, HCC, CRC (MSI-H/dMMR), esophageal/GEJ cancer, mesothelioma, gastric cancer, and others
CemiplimabFully human IgG4Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, NSCLC

Anti-PD-L1 (Programmed Death-Ligand 1) Inhibitors

PD-L1 inhibitors block the ligand PD-L1 on tumor cells and antigen-presenting cells, preventing its engagement with PD-1 (and also B7-1/CD80) on T cells.

AgentTypeApproved Indications (Select)
AtezolizumabHumanized IgG1 (Fc-engineered, non-ADCC)NSCLC, SCLC, urothelial carcinoma, TNBC, HCC, melanoma
DurvalumabFully human IgG1 (Fc-engineered)NSCLC (stage III unresectable, consolidation), SCLC, biliary tract cancer, endometrial cancer, HCC
AvelumabFully human IgG1 (intact ADCC)Merkel cell carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma (maintenance)

Anti-CTLA-4 (Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte-Associated Protein 4) Inhibitors

CTLA-4 is an inhibitory receptor that competes with the co-stimulatory receptor CD28 for binding to B7 ligands (CD80/CD86) on antigen-presenting cells. CTLA-4 blockade enhances T-cell activation and proliferation, particularly in the priming phase of the immune response.

AgentTypeApproved Indications (Select)
IpilimumabFully human IgG1Melanoma (adjuvant and metastatic), RCC (with nivolumab), NSCLC (with nivolumab), CRC (MSI-H, with nivolumab), HCC (with nivolumab), mesothelioma (with nivolumab)
TremelimumabFully human IgG2HCC (with durvalumab), NSCLC (with durvalumab + chemotherapy)

Anti-LAG-3 (Lymphocyte-Activation Gene 3) Inhibitor

AgentTypeApproved Indications
RelatlimabFully human IgG4Melanoma (fixed-dose combination with nivolumab)

Combination Immunotherapy

Combination regimens using anti-CTLA-4 plus anti-PD-1 (e.g., ipilimumab plus nivolumab) or anti-CTLA-4 plus anti-PD-L1 (e.g., tremelimumab plus durvalumab) produce higher response rates in several tumor types but are associated with significantly higher rates and severity of irAEs. Toxicity profiles of combination regimens are discussed in detail in Part 5.3


The precise pathophysiology of irAEs is incompletely understood but involves several interrelated mechanisms:2 4

  1. Loss of peripheral self-tolerance. Checkpoint receptors normally function to maintain peripheral tolerance by dampening T-cell responses to self-antigens. Blocking these receptors unleashes autoreactive T cells that can attack normal tissues.

  2. Cross-reactivity between tumor neoantigens and self-antigens. T cells primed against tumor-associated antigens may cross-react with homologous antigens expressed in normal tissues (molecular mimicry).

  3. Enhanced T-cell priming and expansion. Particularly relevant for anti-CTLA-4 agents, which augment T-cell activation in lymph nodes, leading to broader and more polyclonal T-cell responses including autoreactive clones.

  4. Alteration of humoral immunity. ICIs can increase autoantibody production and disrupt B-cell tolerance.

  5. Enhanced cytokine production. Increased levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-17, IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha) contribute to tissue inflammation and damage.

  6. Complement activation and direct antibody-mediated effects. Some irAEs may involve complement deposition or antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity, particularly in the case of anti-CTLA-4 agents (IgG1 isotype).


Epidemiology, Timing, and Risk Factors

Incidence by Agent Class

ParameterAnti-CTLA-4 MonotherapyAnti-PD-1/PD-L1 MonotherapyAnti-CTLA-4 + Anti-PD-1 Combination
Any-grade irAE60%–85%55%–70%80%–95%
Grade 3–4 irAE20%–30%10%–15%40%–60%
Treatment discontinuation due to irAE10%–15%5%–10%30%–40%
irAE-related mortality< 1%–2%< 1%1%–2%

Typical Timing of irAE Onset

While irAEs can occur at any time – including weeks to months after treatment discontinuation – the following general patterns are observed:1 4

Organ SystemTypical Onset After Treatment Initiation
Dermatologic2–6 weeks (often earliest to appear)
Gastrointestinal (colitis)5–10 weeks
Hepatic6–14 weeks
Endocrine (thyroiditis)4–8 weeks
Endocrine (hypophysitis)6–12 weeks (more common with anti-CTLA-4)
Pulmonary (pneumonitis)8–14 weeks
Renal8–16 weeks
NeurologicVariable, can be early or late
Cardiac (myocarditis)Often early, median ~30 days; frequently within first 2 cycles
HematologicVariable

Delayed irAEs: irAEs can present months to over a year after treatment discontinuation. Clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for irAEs in any patient with a history of ICI exposure, even if treatment was completed or discontinued long prior.5

Risk Factors for irAEs

  • Combination immunotherapy (anti-CTLA-4 + anti-PD-1) is the strongest risk factor for severe irAEs
  • Higher doses of ipilimumab (3 mg/kg vs 1 mg/kg) are associated with increased toxicity
  • Preexisting autoimmune disease (see Part 5)
  • Prior irAE with rechallenge (see Part 5)
  • Certain tumor types may have higher rates of specific irAEs (e.g., melanoma patients may have higher rates of colitis)
  • Concurrent radiation therapy may increase risk of pneumonitis in irradiated fields
  • Genetic factors (certain HLA alleles) are under investigation

CTCAE Grading: General Framework

All irAEs are graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), currently version 5.0. The general grading framework is:1 3

GradeDefinitionGeneral Clinical Significance
Grade 1Mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicatedUsually continue ICI with close monitoring
Grade 2Moderate; minimal, local, or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADLUsually hold ICI; initiate corticosteroids for most organ systems
Grade 3Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; limiting self-care ADLHold ICI; high-dose corticosteroids; consider immunosuppressive escalation
Grade 4Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicatedPermanently discontinue ICI (with rare exceptions); high-dose IV corticosteroids; immunosuppressive escalation
Grade 5Death related to adverse event

Organ-specific grading criteria are detailed in the respective sections of Parts 2 through 5.


General Principles for Holding, Resuming, and Discontinuing Immunotherapy

When to Hold Immunotherapy

  • Grade 2 irAEs (most organ systems): Hold ICI until toxicity resolves to grade 1 or lower. Endocrine irAEs that are well controlled on hormone replacement are an exception and typically do not require holding therapy.1
  • Grade 3 irAEs: Hold ICI. May resume once toxicity resolves to grade 1 or lower and corticosteroids are tapered to prednisone equivalent of 10 mg/day or less, but only after careful risk-benefit discussion.
  • Any irAE requiring hospitalization should prompt ICI hold pending workup and stabilization.

When to Permanently Discontinue Immunotherapy

Permanent discontinuation is recommended for:1 3 5

  • Any grade 4 irAE (with exceptions for endocrine irAEs manageable with hormone replacement)
  • Grade 3 irAEs that do not improve to grade 1 within 12 weeks of corticosteroid initiation
  • Inability to taper corticosteroids to prednisone 10 mg/day or equivalent within 12 weeks
  • Recurrence of grade 3 irAE upon rechallenge
  • Specific organ toxicities regardless of grade:
    • Myocarditis (any grade – given high mortality)
    • Grade 3–4 pneumonitis
    • Grade 4 colitis
    • Grade 4 hepatitis (AST/ALT > 20x ULN or total bilirubin > 10x ULN)
    • Grade 3–4 neurologic irAEs (myasthenia gravis, Guillain-Barre, encephalitis)
    • Stevens-Johnson syndrome or toxic epidermal necrolysis
    • Grade 4 nephritis
    • Grade 3–4 myositis (particularly with cardiac or respiratory involvement)

Holding Anti-CTLA-4 vs Anti-PD-1 in Combination Regimens

In patients receiving combination anti-CTLA-4 + anti-PD-1 who develop irAEs:

  • Grade 2 irAE: May hold both agents or consider discontinuing anti-CTLA-4 and continuing anti-PD-1 after resolution
  • Grade 3 irAE: Hold both agents; upon resolution, may consider resuming anti-PD-1 monotherapy after careful discussion, permanently discontinuing anti-CTLA-4
  • Grade 4 irAE: Permanently discontinue both agents (with endocrine exceptions as noted)

Corticosteroid Protocols

Corticosteroids are the cornerstone of irAE management. The following general dosing framework applies across most organ systems, with organ-specific modifications detailed in subsequent parts.1 2 3

Corticosteroid Dosing by irAE Grade

irAE GradeRecommended Corticosteroid Approach
Grade 1Corticosteroids generally not indicated (exceptions: topical steroids for dermatologic irAEs); monitor closely
Grade 2Prednisone 0.5–1 mg/kg/day (oral); some organ systems warrant starting at 1 mg/kg/day
Grade 3Prednisone 1–2 mg/kg/day (oral) or methylprednisolone 1–2 mg/kg/day (IV) if unable to take oral or if urgent/severe
Grade 4Methylprednisolone 1–2 mg/kg/day IV (or pulse-dose methylprednisolone 1 g IV daily for 3 days for life-threatening presentations such as myocarditis, severe encephalitis, severe pneumonitis)

Corticosteroid Taper Protocol

Premature tapering is one of the most common causes of irAE relapse. The following general taper schedule is recommended:1 3

For Grade 2 irAEs (starting from prednisone 0.5–1 mg/kg/day):

  • Once irAE improves to grade 1 or lower, begin taper
  • Taper by 10 mg per week if starting dose is 40–60 mg/day
  • Taper by 5 mg per week once below 20 mg/day
  • Total taper duration: minimum 4–6 weeks

For Grade 3–4 irAEs (starting from prednisone 1–2 mg/kg/day or IV equivalent):

  • Once irAE improves to grade 1 or lower, transition from IV to oral if applicable
  • Taper by 10 mg per week if starting dose > 60 mg/day
  • Taper by 5–10 mg per week once at 40–60 mg/day
  • Taper by 5 mg per week once below 20 mg/day
  • Total taper duration: minimum 6–8 weeks (some organ systems require longer, e.g., hepatitis, colitis)

Critical principles for corticosteroid tapering:

  • Do not taper faster than the minimum recommended schedule, even if the patient feels well
  • If irAE symptoms recur during taper, increase dose to the last effective dose and attempt a slower taper after at least 1 week of stabilization
  • If unable to taper below prednisone 10 mg/day within 12 weeks, consider steroid-sparing immunosuppressive agents and permanent discontinuation of ICI
  • Prolonged corticosteroid use (> 4 weeks at prednisone > 20 mg/day) warrants PJP prophylaxis with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (single-strength tablet daily or double-strength three times weekly), stress-dose steroid education, bone health assessment, and glucose monitoring

Supportive Care During Corticosteroid Therapy

MeasureIndicationDetails
PJP prophylaxisPrednisone >/= 20 mg/day for >/= 4 weeksTMP-SMX SS daily or DS three times weekly; alternatives: dapsone 100 mg daily or atovaquone 1500 mg daily
Proton pump inhibitorPrednisone >/= 20 mg/dayStandard-dose PPI (e.g., omeprazole 20 mg daily)
Glucose monitoringAll patients on corticosteroidsFasting blood glucose; consider fingerstick monitoring in diabetic patients or those on > 40 mg/day prednisone
Bone healthAnticipated duration > 3 monthsCalcium 1000–1200 mg/day + vitamin D 800–1000 IU/day; consider DEXA scan and bisphosphonate if prolonged use
Stress-dose steroid educationAll patients on chronic corticosteroidsEducate patients to not abruptly discontinue; advise medic-alert identification; stress dosing for illness/surgery
Insomnia and mood assessmentAll patientsMorning dosing preferred; consider sleep aids if needed

Immunosuppressive Escalation Protocols

For irAEs that are refractory to corticosteroids (no improvement within 48–72 hours of high-dose corticosteroids, or worsening despite adequate dosing), escalation to additional immunosuppressive agents is warranted. The choice of agent depends on the organ system involved.1 2 3 6

Summary of Immunosuppressive Agents for Steroid-Refractory irAEs

AgentMechanismPrimary irAE IndicationsDosingKey Considerations
InfliximabAnti-TNF-alpha monoclonal antibodyColitis (first-line escalation); may consider for arthritis5 mg/kg IV; may repeat in 2 weeks if inadequate responseContraindicated in hepatitis and hepatic irAEs (hepatotoxic); check for latent TB, hepatitis B before use; avoid in perforation or sepsis
VedolizumabAnti-alpha4-beta7 integrin (gut-selective)Colitis (alternative to infliximab or for infliximab-refractory colitis)300 mg IV; may repeat at weeks 2 and 6Gut-selective; may be preferred over infliximab for hepatotoxicity risk; slower onset than infliximab
Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)Inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase inhibitor (lymphocyte-selective antiproliferative)Hepatitis (first-line escalation); pneumonitis; nephritis500–1000 mg PO twice dailyFirst-line steroid-sparing agent for hepatic irAEs (infliximab contraindicated); GI side effects; check CBC regularly
TacrolimusCalcineurin inhibitorHepatitis (refractory to MMF); nephritis; neurologic irAEsTargeting trough level 5–10 ng/mLMonitor renal function and drug levels closely; neurotoxicity risk
Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG)Polyclonal T-cell-depleting antibodySevere steroid-refractory irAEs (myocarditis, encephalitis, aplastic anemia)1.5 mg/kg/day IV for 3–5 days (thymoglobulin)Reserve for life-threatening, refractory cases; premedicate for infusion reactions; profound immunosuppression
IV immunoglobulin (IVIG)Immunomodulatory (multiple mechanisms)Myasthenia gravis, Guillain-Barre, encephalitis, hemolytic anemia, ITP0.4 g/kg/day IV for 5 days (total 2 g/kg)First-line escalation for many neurologic irAEs; check IgA levels before use
Plasmapheresis (PLEX)Removal of circulating antibodies, cytokines, complementMyasthenia gravis (crisis), Guillain-Barre, TTP5–7 exchanges over 10–14 daysFirst-line for myasthenic crisis; logistic considerations (central access, apheresis availability)
RituximabAnti-CD20 (B-cell depletion)Hemolytic anemia, ITP (refractory), bullous pemphigoid (refractory), encephalitis (refractory)375 mg/m2 IV weekly x 4, or 1000 mg IV x 2 (days 1 and 15)Check hepatitis B serology before use; prolonged B-cell suppression
TocilizumabAnti-IL-6 receptorConsidered for steroid-refractory irAEs, particularly CRS-like presentations8 mg/kg IV (max 800 mg)Limited data in irAE setting; used by analogy to CAR-T CRS management
AbataceptCTLA-4-Ig (blocks T-cell co-stimulation)Myocarditis (case reports/series); steroid-refractory irAEs10 mg/kg IVParadoxically uses a CTLA-4 agonist pathway; emerging data

Algorithm for Steroid-Refractory irAEs

  1. Confirm adequate corticosteroid dosing (prednisone 1–2 mg/kg/day or IV equivalent) for at least 48–72 hours
  2. Rule out alternative diagnoses (infection, disease progression, other drug effect)
  3. Select organ-specific immunosuppressive agent (see organ-specific chapters)
  4. Initiate immunosuppressive agent while continuing high-dose corticosteroids
  5. Once irAE improves, taper corticosteroids first, then taper or discontinue the second-line agent
  6. If inadequate response to first second-line agent within 48–72 hours, escalate to third-line agent or consider multidisciplinary consultation

Infusion reactions are distinct from irAEs and must be differentiated because they require different management approaches.1 3

Key Differences

FeatureInfusion ReactionImmune-Related Adverse Event
TimingDuring or within 24 hours of infusionDays to weeks (or months) after treatment initiation
MechanismType I hypersensitivity (IgE-mediated) or cytokine release; non-immune anaphylactoidT-cell-mediated autoimmune/autoinflammatory
SymptomsFlushing, urticaria, rigors, fever, dyspnea, hypotension, wheezing, angioedemaOrgan-specific (diarrhea, rash, hepatitis, pneumonitis, etc.)
TreatmentStop or slow infusion; antihistamines (diphenhydramine 25–50 mg IV); acetaminophen; corticosteroids for moderate-severe; epinephrine for anaphylaxisOrgan-specific management; systemic corticosteroids; immunosuppressive escalation
RechallengeOften possible with premedication and slower rate (for grade 1–2); permanently discontinue for grade 3–4 anaphylaxisDepends on organ system and grade (see rechallenge criteria in Part 5)

Infusion Reaction Grading and Management

GradePresentationManagement
Grade 1Mild transient reaction; infusion interruption not indicatedSlow infusion rate; monitor; may premedicate for subsequent infusions
Grade 2Requires therapy or infusion interruption but responds promptly to symptomatic treatment; prophylaxis indicated for up to 24 hoursHold infusion; diphenhydramine 25–50 mg IV, acetaminophen 650 mg PO/IV, +/- hydrocortisone 100 mg IV; resume at 50% rate after resolution; premedicate for future infusions
Grade 3Prolonged (not rapidly responsive to symptomatic medication); recurrence after initial improvement; hospitalization indicatedStop infusion; aggressive medical management (epinephrine 0.3–0.5 mg IM if hypotension/bronchospasm; IV fluids; corticosteroids); monitor for at least 6 hours; consider permanent discontinuation of the specific agent
Grade 4Life-threatening; urgent intervention (pressor support, ventilatory support)Stop infusion immediately; epinephrine; call code if needed; permanently discontinue the specific agent

Avelumab-Specific Premedication

Avelumab has a higher rate of infusion reactions (approximately 25%) compared to other ICIs. Standard premedication with diphenhydramine 25–50 mg and acetaminophen 500–650 mg approximately 30 minutes before the first 4 infusions is recommended per the prescribing information.1


Baseline Evaluation and Monitoring During ICI Therapy

AssessmentRationale
Comprehensive metabolic panel (including LFTs, creatinine)Baseline organ function; detect preexisting abnormalities
Complete blood count with differentialBaseline hematologic parameters
Thyroid function tests (TSH, free T4)Detect preexisting thyroid disease; establish baseline
Hemoglobin A1c or fasting glucoseBaseline for monitoring ICI-induced diabetes
Morning cortisol (consider)Baseline for adrenal function if clinical suspicion
Cardiac troponin (consider for combination therapy or high-risk patients)Baseline for cardiac monitoring; expert panels increasingly recommend for combination regimens
ECGBaseline cardiac rhythm and conduction
Hepatitis B and C serologiesReactivation risk; important before immunosuppressive escalation
Quantiferon-TB Gold or PPDRequired before infliximab or other anti-TNF therapy if needed later
Brain MRI with pituitary protocol (if indicated)Baseline pituitary imaging if symptoms suggest prior pituitary disease
Pulmonary function tests (if baseline lung disease)Baseline for pulmonary irAE monitoring

Routine Monitoring During ICI Therapy

TestFrequency
Comprehensive metabolic panel (LFTs, creatinine, electrolytes)Before each cycle
Complete blood countBefore each cycle
TSH (free T4 if TSH abnormal)Every 4–6 weeks during treatment and for 6 months after discontinuation
Symptom assessment for irAEsEvery visit; patient education on warning signs
Urinalysis (consider)Periodically; at minimum if creatinine rises
Troponin, BNP (consider)If cardiac symptoms develop; routine monitoring debated
Blood glucoseBefore each cycle; more frequently if on corticosteroids
Clinical assessment (skin, respiratory, GI, neurologic review of systems)Every visit

General Approach to irAE Workup

When an irAE is suspected, a systematic workup should be performed to confirm the diagnosis and exclude other etiologies:1 2

  1. Grade the toxicity using CTCAE v5.0 criteria specific to the organ system involved
  2. Exclude non-irAE causes: infection, disease progression, other drug toxicity, unrelated medical conditions
  3. Obtain organ-specific laboratory and imaging studies as detailed in subsequent organ-system chapters
  4. Consult appropriate subspecialty early for grade 3–4 toxicities or unusual presentations
  5. Hold immunotherapy per grading guidelines
  6. Initiate corticosteroids at the appropriate dose for the grade and organ system
  7. Document the irAE including grade, onset timing, and management plan
  8. Escalate immunosuppression if no improvement within 48–72 hours of adequate corticosteroid dosing
  9. Plan for taper and follow-up once improvement is achieved
  10. Determine ICI rechallenge eligibility (see Part 5)

References


  1. Schneider BJ, Naidoo J, Santomasso BD, et al. Management of immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(36):4073-4126. ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎

  2. Haanen J, Obeid M, Spain L, et al. Management of toxicities from immunotherapy: European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) clinical practice guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2022;33(12):1217-1238. ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎

  3. Thompson JA, Schneider BJ, Brahmer J, et al. Management of immunotherapy-related toxicities, version 1.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022;20(4):387-405. ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎

  4. Postow MA, Sidlow R, Hellmann MD. Immune-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint blockade. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(2):158-168. ↩︎ ↩︎

  5. Puzanov I, Diab A, Abdallah K, et al. Managing toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: consensus recommendations from the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) Toxicity Management Working Group. J Immunother Cancer. 2017;5(1):95. ↩︎ ↩︎

  6. Wang DY, Salem JE, Cohen JV, et al. Fatal toxic effects associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(12):1721-1728. ↩︎