Part 3: Delirium Assessment, Prevention, and Management
Complete delirium assessment tools (CAM-ICU flowsheet, ICDSC scoring), delirium subtypes, modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors, evidence-based non-pharmacologic prevention bundles, and pharmacologic management including haloperidol, quetiapine, and dexmedetomidine dosing.
Delirium in the ICU: Overview
Delirium is an acute, fluctuating disturbance in attention and awareness, accompanied by additional cognitive dysfunction (disorientation, memory deficit, language disturbance, visuospatial impairment, or perceptual disturbance) that is not better explained by a pre-existing neurocognitive disorder and does not occur in the context of a severely reduced level of arousal (e.g., coma).1 2
Epidemiology
| Population | Delirium Prevalence |
|---|---|
| Mechanically ventilated patients | 60–80% |
| Non-ventilated medical ICU | 20–50% |
| Post-cardiac surgery | 30–50% |
| Post-operative (non-cardiac) ICU | 15–40% |
| Elderly (≥ 65) ICU patients | 50–70% |
Consequences of ICU Delirium
| Outcome | Impact |
|---|---|
| Mortality | 2–4× increased odds of death; each additional day of delirium increases 10-day mortality by 10%3 |
| Duration of mechanical ventilation | Increased by 2–4 days |
| ICU length of stay | Increased by 5–10 days |
| Hospital length of stay | Increased by 5–8 days |
| Long-term cognitive impairment | 34% of survivors have cognitive impairment at 12 months (similar to moderate traumatic brain injury); 24% at 12 months similar to mild Alzheimer disease4 |
| Institutionalization | Increased rate of discharge to long-term care facilities |
| Healthcare costs | Estimated additional $16,000–$64,000 per patient per hospitalization |
| Post-traumatic stress | Higher rates of PTSD, depression, and anxiety |
Delirium Subtypes
| Subtype | Prevalence in ICU | Characteristics | RASS Range | Detection Difficulty | Prognosis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hyperactive | 1–2% (pure form) | Agitation, restlessness, emotional lability, pulling at tubes, combativeness | +1 to +4 | Easy — obvious behavioral changes | Better prognosis than other subtypes |
| Hypoactive | 40–50% | Decreased alertness, lethargy, reduced motor activity, flat affect, withdrawal, inattention | −1 to −3 | Difficult — often missed; may be mistaken for depression or over-sedation | Worse prognosis; higher mortality; more associated with long-term cognitive impairment |
| Mixed | 45–55% | Fluctuates between hyperactive and hypoactive features within same 24-hour period | Varies | Moderate | Intermediate prognosis |
Clinical Pearl: Hypoactive delirium is the most common subtype and the most frequently missed. It is associated with worse outcomes than hyperactive delirium. Routine screening with validated tools is essential to detect it.2
Delirium Assessment Tools
The Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) — Complete Flowsheet
The CAM-ICU is the most widely used and validated bedside delirium assessment tool for ICU patients. It can be completed in 1–2 minutes by trained nurses, physicians, or other providers. Sensitivity is 80–95% and specificity is 89–100% when performed by trained assessors.2 5
Prerequisites before performing the CAM-ICU:
- The patient must have a RASS score of −3 or higher (responsive to at least voice)
- If RASS is −4 or −5 → patient is in coma → CAM-ICU cannot be assessed (record as “unable to assess — coma”)
CAM-ICU Flowsheet: Four Features
The CAM-ICU is POSITIVE (delirium present) if Feature 1 AND Feature 2 are present, PLUS either Feature 3 OR Feature 4.
Feature 1: Acute Onset or Fluctuating Course
| Question | Source |
|---|---|
| Is there an acute change in mental status from baseline? | Medical record review; family or nursing report |
| Has the mental status fluctuated in the past 24 hours? | Observation; serial RASS scores showing variability |
| Has the RASS score fluctuated in the past 24 hours? | Nursing documentation |
Scoring: If YES to any of the above → Feature 1 is POSITIVE → proceed to Feature 2. If NO to all → Feature 1 is NEGATIVE → CAM-ICU is NEGATIVE (no delirium). STOP.
Feature 2: Inattention — Assessed Using the Attention Screening Examination (ASE)
Two methods are available; use whichever the patient can perform:
Method A — Auditory (Letters Test) (PREFERRED)
Read the following 10 letters slowly (one letter per second) in a monotone voice. Instruct the patient: “I am going to read you a series of 10 letters. Squeeze my hand whenever you hear the letter ‘A’.”
Letter sequence: S A V E A H A A R T
| Letter | Correct Response |
|---|---|
| S | Do NOT squeeze |
| A | SQUEEZE |
| V | Do NOT squeeze |
| E | Do NOT squeeze |
| A | SQUEEZE |
| H | Do NOT squeeze |
| A | SQUEEZE |
| A | SQUEEZE |
| R | Do NOT squeeze |
| T | Do NOT squeeze |
Errors = failing to squeeze on “A” OR squeezing on a non-“A” letter.
Method B — Visual (Pictures Test)
Show a set of 5 pictures. Then show a set of 10 pictures (the original 5 mixed with 5 new pictures). The patient must nod “yes” or “no” to indicate whether they have seen each picture before. Count errors (incorrect responses).
Scoring Feature 2:
- 0–2 errors → Feature 2 is NEGATIVE (attention intact) → CAM-ICU is NEGATIVE. STOP.
- > 2 errors → Feature 2 is POSITIVE (inattention present) → Proceed to Feature 3.
Feature 3: Altered Level of Consciousness
| Assessment | Result |
|---|---|
| Current RASS score | Record the current RASS |
Scoring:
- RASS = 0 (alert and calm) → Feature 3 is NEGATIVE → Proceed to Feature 4
- RASS ≠ 0 (any score other than 0) → Feature 3 is POSITIVE → CAM-ICU is POSITIVE (delirium present). STOP.
Feature 4: Disorganized Thinking
Ask the following Yes/No questions AND perform a simple command:
Set A (use on odd calendar days or first assessment):
| Question | Correct Answer |
|---|---|
| Will a stone float on water? | No |
| Are there fish in the sea? | Yes |
| Does one pound weigh more than two pounds? | No |
| Can you use a hammer to pound a nail? | Yes |
Set B (use on even calendar days or alternate assessments):
| Question | Correct Answer |
|---|---|
| Will a leaf float on water? | Yes |
| Are there elephants in the sea? | No |
| Do two pounds weigh more than one pound? | Yes |
| Can you use a hammer to cut wood? | No |
Command: “Hold up this many fingers” (examiner holds up 2 fingers). After the patient does this, say “Now do the same thing with the other hand” (the patient should hold up 2 fingers on the other hand without being shown again). If patient is unable to move both arms, substitute: “Add one more finger” (patient should hold up 3 fingers).
Scoring Feature 4:
- Count errors from the questions (each incorrect answer = 1 error) and the command (inability to complete = 1 error)
- 0–1 errors → Feature 4 is NEGATIVE → CAM-ICU is NEGATIVE
- > 1 error → Feature 4 is POSITIVE → CAM-ICU is POSITIVE (delirium present)
CAM-ICU Summary Flowsheet
Step 1: Assess RASS
├── RASS −4 or −5 → COMA → Cannot assess CAM-ICU → Reassess later
└── RASS ≥ −3 → Proceed to CAM-ICU
Step 2: Feature 1 — Acute onset or fluctuating course?
├── NO → CAM-ICU NEGATIVE (No Delirium)
└── YES → Proceed to Feature 2
Step 3: Feature 2 — Inattention (ASE Letters or Pictures)?
├── ≤ 2 errors → CAM-ICU NEGATIVE (No Delirium)
└── > 2 errors → Proceed to Feature 3
Step 4: Feature 3 — Altered level of consciousness (RASS ≠ 0)?
├── YES (RASS ≠ 0) → CAM-ICU POSITIVE (Delirium Present)
└── NO (RASS = 0) → Proceed to Feature 4
Step 5: Feature 4 — Disorganized thinking?
├── > 1 error → CAM-ICU POSITIVE (Delirium Present)
└── ≤ 1 error → CAM-ICU NEGATIVE (No Delirium)
CAM-ICU Assessment Frequency
| Setting | Recommended Frequency |
|---|---|
| All ICU patients | At least every 8–12 hours (once per nursing shift), ideally every 8 hours |
| During SAT (sedation interruption) | After awakening (RASS ≥ −3) |
| When clinical change noted | Immediately |
| Post-operative (first 72 hours) | Every 8 hours minimum |
Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) — Complete Scoring
The ICDSC is an 8-item checklist completed by the bedside nurse based on observations over an 8–24 hour period. Each item is scored 0 (absent) or 1 (present). Total score ranges from 0 to 8. A score ≥ 4 indicates delirium. Sensitivity is 74–99% and specificity is 64–82%.6
ICDSC — Complete Scoring Table
| Item | Assessment | Score 0 | Score 1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Altered level of consciousness | Assess over the shift: Was there any period of altered consciousness? | Normal wakefulness, or easily arousable throughout shift | Any of the following: (a) hypervigilance/agitation, (b) lethargy/drowsiness (awakens to mild-moderate stimulation), (c) difficult to arouse (awakens only to strong stimulation), (d) unarousable (score N/A if comatose entire shift) |
| 2. Inattention | Difficulty following commands or conversation; easily distracted; difficulty shifting attention | Follows commands and conversation consistently | Any difficulty following commands; loses track of conversation; distracted by external stimuli |
| 3. Disorientation | Does the patient recognize ICU staff? Is the patient oriented to the current situation? | Oriented to person, place, and situation | Any obvious misidentification of people or places; unaware of current situation |
| 4. Hallucination, delusion, or psychosis | Clinical manifestation of hallucinations or behavior produced by hallucinations/delusions (including trying to remove non-existent objects) | None observed | Hallucinations, delusions, or psychotic behavior observed |
| 5. Psychomotor agitation or retardation | Hyperactivity requiring sedation or restraints OR hypoactivity (slowed, decreased movement — not due to sedation) | Normal activity | Hyperactivity requiring additional intervention OR hypoactivity/slowness not attributable to sedation |
| 6. Inappropriate speech or mood | Inappropriate, disorganized, or incoherent speech; inappropriate emotional display | Normal, appropriate speech and mood | Inappropriate, disorganized, or incoherent speech OR inappropriate mood/emotional display |
| 7. Sleep/wake cycle disturbance | Sleeping < 4 hours at night; frequent awakenings; sleeping during most of the day | Normal sleep/wake pattern | Any significant disruption: sleeping < 4 hours at night, waking frequently, sleeping most of day |
| 8. Symptom fluctuation | Fluctuation of any of the above items (items 1–7) during the assessment period | Symptoms stable or absent | Any fluctuation in the above manifestations over the 8–24 hour assessment period |
| ICDSC Total Score | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| 0 | No delirium |
| 1–3 | Subsyndromal delirium (associated with worse outcomes than no delirium) |
| ≥ 4 | Delirium (clinical delirium — initiate management) |
Choosing Between CAM-ICU and ICDSC
| Feature | CAM-ICU | ICDSC |
|---|---|---|
| Assessment type | Point-in-time bedside test | Observation-based checklist over 8–24 h |
| Time to complete | 1–2 minutes | 2–5 minutes (based on shift observations) |
| Sensitivity | 80–95% | 74–99% |
| Specificity | 89–100% | 64–82% |
| Training required | Moderate (structured test) | Low (observational) |
| Identifies subsyndromal delirium | No (binary: positive or negative) | Yes (scores 1–3) |
| Can assess in non-verbal patients | Yes | Yes |
| Requires patient interaction | Yes (must perform tests) | No (based on observation) |
Recommendation: Both tools are acceptable. The CAM-ICU has higher specificity and is the most widely studied. The ICDSC may have higher sensitivity in some settings and captures subsyndromal delirium. An institution should select one tool and ensure consistent training and compliance.1
Delirium Risk Factors
Non-Modifiable Risk Factors
| Risk Factor | Relative Risk / Odds Ratio |
|---|---|
| Advanced age (≥ 65 years) | OR 2.0–3.5 |
| Pre-existing cognitive impairment / dementia | OR 2.5–6.3 |
| History of delirium | OR 2.0–3.0 |
| History of depression | OR 1.5–2.0 |
| History of alcohol use disorder | OR 2.0–4.0 |
| Male sex (some studies) | OR 1.2–1.5 |
| Severity of illness (APACHE II ≥ 24) | OR 1.5–3.0 |
| Admission diagnosis of trauma or burns | OR 1.5–2.5 |
| Surgical (vs. medical) admission | Variable |
| Genetic factors (APOE4 allele) | OR 1.5–2.0 (limited evidence) |
Modifiable Risk Factors
| Risk Factor | Relative Risk / Odds Ratio | Intervention |
|---|---|---|
| Benzodiazepine use | OR 2.0–4.0 per day of exposure | Avoid benzodiazepines; use non-benzodiazepine sedation |
| Deep sedation | OR 2.0–3.0 | Target light sedation (RASS 0 to −2) |
| Untreated pain | OR 1.5–2.5 | Routine pain assessment and analgesia |
| Physical restraints | OR 1.4–2.0 | Minimize restraint use; use alternatives |
| Immobility | OR 1.5–2.5 | Early mobilization |
| Sleep deprivation | OR 1.5–2.0 | Sleep promotion protocols |
| Anticholinergic medications | OR 1.5–2.5 | Medication review; avoid high-anticholinergic drugs |
| Prolonged mechanical ventilation | OR 1.5–3.0 | SAT/SBT protocols; early extubation |
| Metabolic derangements (acidosis, uremia, electrolyte abnormalities) | Variable | Correct underlying metabolic disorder |
| Sepsis / infection | OR 2.0–5.0 | Early recognition and treatment of infections |
| Dehydration | OR 1.5–2.0 | Adequate hydration |
| Sensory deprivation (no glasses, hearing aids) | OR 1.5–2.0 | Provide assistive devices |
| Indwelling urinary catheter | OR 1.5–2.5 | Remove as soon as possible |
Delirium Prevention
Non-Pharmacologic Delirium Prevention Bundle
Non-pharmacologic, multicomponent prevention strategies are the cornerstone of delirium prevention and are recommended for all ICU patients (strong recommendation).1 7
| Domain | Interventions | Evidence Level |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive stimulation / reorientation | Reorient to time, place, person at each interaction; provide clocks and calendars visible from bed; encourage family to bring familiar objects (photos, personal items); engage in conversation appropriate to cognitive level; TV/radio for orientation (not constant background noise) | Moderate |
| Sleep promotion | Cluster care activities to minimize nighttime interruptions; reduce ambient light at night; provide earplugs and/or eye masks; minimize nighttime noise (target < 45 dB); maintain daytime light exposure; avoid sleep-disrupting medications at night (see Part 4) | Moderate |
| Early mobility | Begin mobilization within 24–48 hours when safe; progressive activity (passive ROM → active ROM → sitting → standing → ambulation); see Part 4 for detailed protocol | Moderate |
| Sensory optimization | Ensure patients have their glasses and hearing aids; check hearing aid batteries; clean glasses daily; maximize communication ability | Low-Moderate |
| Pain management | Routine pain assessment with validated tools; treat pain proactively; multimodal analgesia (see Part 1) | Moderate |
| Medication review | Avoid/minimize benzodiazepines, anticholinergics, antihistamines (diphenhydramine), meperidine; perform daily medication reconciliation to identify delirium-contributing medications | Moderate |
| Minimize sedation | Light sedation target; daily SAT; nurse-driven sedation protocol; analgesia-first approach (see Part 2) | Strong |
| Family engagement | Encourage family presence and participation in care; structured family communication; family presence during SAT; family can assist with reorientation | Low-Moderate |
| Environmental modification | Reduce unnecessary alarms; single-patient rooms when possible; minimize patient transfers; maintain consistent nursing assignment | Low |
| Hydration and nutrition | Ensure adequate hydration; early enteral nutrition; correct electrolyte abnormalities | Low-Moderate |
| Catheter and restraint minimization | Remove unnecessary lines, tubes, and catheters; remove restraints when possible; provide alternatives to restraints (1:1 sitter, bed alarms, family presence) | Low-Moderate |
Pharmacologic Delirium Prevention
The 2018 guidelines do NOT recommend routine pharmacologic prophylaxis for delirium in most ICU patients. Specific findings:1
| Agent | Recommendation for Prevention |
|---|---|
| Haloperidol | NOT recommended for delirium prevention (no benefit in RCTs) |
| Atypical antipsychotics | NOT recommended for delirium prevention |
| Dexmedetomidine | Conditional recommendation for use as a sedative that is associated with lower delirium incidence compared to benzodiazepines (this is a sedation choice, not a prophylactic intervention) |
| Statins | NOT recommended for delirium prevention |
| Ketamine | Insufficient evidence for delirium prevention |
| Melatonin / Ramelteon | Insufficient evidence; some promising data; not formally recommended |
Exception — Perioperative dexmedetomidine: In cardiac and non-cardiac surgical populations, perioperative dexmedetomidine has shown delirium-preventive effects in some trials. This may be considered for high-risk surgical ICU patients (conditional recommendation based on limited evidence).8
Delirium Management
Step 1: Identify and Treat Underlying Causes
When delirium is identified, the first priority is to identify and treat reversible precipitating factors. The mnemonic “THINK” can be used:1 9
| Letter | Domain | Specific Causes to Investigate |
|---|---|---|
| T | Toxic / medications | Benzodiazepines, anticholinergics, opioids (accumulation), corticosteroids, antihistamines, fluoroquinolones; new medication review; drug interactions |
| H | Hypoxemia / metabolic | Hypoxia (check SpO2, ABG); hypercapnia; hepatic encephalopathy; uremia; hypo/hyperglycemia; hypo/hypernatremia; hypercalcemia; thyroid dysfunction; adrenal insufficiency; acidosis |
| I | Infection / Inflammation | New or worsening infection (UTI, pneumonia, line infection, wound, Clostridioides difficile, meningitis); sepsis; pancreatitis |
| N | Non-pharmacologic interventions | Is the bundle being applied? Check sleep, mobility, reorientation, sensory aids, restraint minimization |
| K | K+ and electrolytes | Hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, hypophosphatemia, hypo/hypernatremia, hypercalcemia |
Step 2: Non-Pharmacologic Management
All non-pharmacologic prevention strategies (see prevention bundle above) should be continued and intensified during active delirium.1 7
| Intervention | Application in Active Delirium |
|---|---|
| Reorientation | Increase frequency; have family assist; use simple, calm language |
| Mobility | Continue/initiate if safe — exercise may reduce delirium duration |
| Sleep promotion | Intensify nighttime sleep protection |
| Minimize noxious stimuli | Reduce alarms, lights, noise; limit nighttime interventions |
| Pain control | Re-assess pain; ensure adequate analgesia |
| Remove deliriogenic medications | Stop or reduce benzodiazepines, anticholinergics, unnecessary opioids |
| Remove unnecessary devices | Foley catheters, unnecessary IV lines, restraints |
| Music therapy | May reduce anxiety and delirium severity |
Step 3: Pharmacologic Management of Delirium
The 2018 guidelines recommend AGAINST the routine use of haloperidol or atypical antipsychotics for the treatment of ICU delirium (conditional recommendation), based on the MIND-USA and AID-ICU trials which found no significant benefit on delirium duration, ventilator-free days, or mortality.1 10 11
However, antipsychotics may be considered in the following circumstances:
- Patients with severe agitation that poses an immediate safety risk to the patient or staff
- Hyperactive delirium with distressing symptoms (hallucinations, severe agitation) refractory to non-pharmacologic measures
- As a bridge while treating reversible underlying causes
- Patients with delirium and significant psychological distress
Haloperidol
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Mechanism | D2 dopamine receptor antagonist (typical/first-generation antipsychotic) |
| Route | IV preferred in ICU (faster onset, fewer EPS than IM); also IM, PO |
| IV dose — mild agitation | 0.5–2 mg IV q 4–6 h PRN |
| IV dose — moderate agitation | 2–5 mg IV q 2–4 h PRN |
| IV dose — severe agitation | 5–10 mg IV q 30–60 min until calm; max ~20 mg/day (some protocols up to 40 mg/day with close monitoring) |
| Onset (IV) | 3–20 minutes |
| Duration | 4–8 hours |
| QTc monitoring | Mandatory — obtain baseline ECG before starting; monitor QTc q 12–24 h; HOLD if QTc > 500 ms or increases by > 25% from baseline |
| Torsades de pointes risk | Dose-dependent; risk increases with hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, concurrent QT-prolonging drugs |
| Extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) | Less common with IV than IM/PO; includes akathisia, dystonia, parkinsonism; treat acute dystonia with diphenhydramine 25–50 mg IV or benztropine 1–2 mg IV |
| Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) | Rare but life-threatening; fever, rigidity, autonomic instability, elevated CK; discontinue immediately; dantrolene and supportive care |
| Contraindications | QTc > 500 ms; history of torsades; Parkinson disease; Lewy body dementia; active NMS |
| Note | IV haloperidol is used off-label (FDA-approved routes are IM and PO only) |
Quetiapine
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Mechanism | Atypical antipsychotic; D2, 5-HT2A, H1, alpha-1 antagonist |
| Route | PO/NG only (no IV formulation) |
| Starting dose | 25–50 mg PO/NG q 12 h (12.5–25 mg in elderly) |
| Titration | Increase by 25–50 mg per dose every 24 h as tolerated |
| Usual effective dose | 50–200 mg PO q 12 h |
| Maximum dose | 400 mg/day (ICU use) |
| Advantages | Sedating (useful for sleep in hypoactive/mixed delirium); lower EPS risk than haloperidol; anxiolytic |
| Disadvantages | PO only (requires enteral access); sedating (may worsen hypoactive delirium); hypotension (alpha-1 blockade); hyperglycemia; QTc prolongation (less than haloperidol) |
| QTc monitoring | Recommended; same thresholds as haloperidol |
| Use in ICU | May be considered when PO route available; some evidence suggests faster delirium resolution when added to haloperidol; useful for nighttime sedation in delirious patients |
Olanzapine
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Mechanism | Atypical antipsychotic; D2, 5-HT2A, muscarinic, H1 antagonist |
| Route | PO, IM (no IV) |
| Dose | 2.5–5 mg PO/IM q 12–24 h; max 20 mg/day |
| Advantages | Available IM; less hypotension than quetiapine |
| Disadvantages | Anticholinergic properties (may worsen delirium paradoxically); metabolic effects; sedation; limited ICU-specific evidence |
Dexmedetomidine for Delirium-Related Sedation
Dexmedetomidine is NOT an antipsychotic but is the preferred sedative for patients with delirium who require sedation, based on its lower delirium-promoting profile compared to benzodiazepines and its potential to facilitate delirium resolution.1 10 12
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Indication in delirium | Sedation for agitated delirious patients who remain on mechanical ventilation; facilitation of extubation in delirious patients; nocturnal sedation for sleep promotion in delirious patients |
| Dose | 0.2–1.5 mcg/kg/h IV infusion (no loading dose in this context to avoid hypotension/bradycardia) |
| Evidence | DahLIA trial: dexmedetomidine vs. placebo for ventilated patients with agitated delirium — faster delirium resolution (median 23.3 vs. 40.0 h), more ventilator-free hours12 |
| Advantages | Does not worsen delirium; produces arousable sedation; no respiratory depression |
| Limitation | Does not treat delirium per se — provides a delirium-friendly form of sedation |
Pharmacologic Treatment Algorithm for ICU Delirium
Step 1: Identify and treat underlying causes (THINK)
↓
Step 2: Implement/intensify non-pharmacologic bundle
↓
Step 3: Assess delirium subtype and severity
├── Hypoactive delirium (calm, inattentive)
│ → Non-pharmacologic interventions are PRIMARY
│ → Remove sedatives if possible
│ → Optimize sleep (quetiapine 25–50 mg PO qHS may help with sleep cycle)
│ → Pharmacologic treatment NOT routinely recommended
│ → Do NOT use haloperidol (may worsen sedation)
│
├── Hyperactive delirium (agitated, hallucinations, combative)
│ → Non-pharmacologic interventions FIRST
│ → If safety concern or significant distress:
│ → Haloperidol 2–5 mg IV q 30 min–4 h PRN (check QTc)
│ → OR quetiapine 25–50 mg PO/NG q 12 h if enteral route available
│ → If on mechanical ventilation requiring sedation:
│ → Dexmedetomidine preferred sedative
│ → AVOID benzodiazepines (worsen delirium)
│
└── Mixed delirium
→ Combine approaches based on predominant symptoms
→ Reassess subtype at each assessment
Duration of Antipsychotic Therapy
- If antipsychotics are initiated for delirium, plan for taper and discontinuation
- Reassess need at least daily
- Once delirium resolves (CAM-ICU negative for ≥ 24 hours), taper and discontinue antipsychotics over 2–5 days
- Do NOT continue antipsychotics at ICU discharge unless the patient had a pre-existing psychiatric indication
- Document the indication, planned duration, and taper plan in the medical record
Benzodiazepines and Delirium
Benzodiazepines are a major risk factor for ICU delirium and should be avoided whenever possible.1 2
| Evidence | Finding |
|---|---|
| Every additional day of benzodiazepine exposure | 4–7% increased odds of delirium transition the following day |
| Midazolam vs. dexmedetomidine (SEDCOM) | Higher delirium prevalence with midazolam (76.6% vs. 54%)13 |
| Lorazepam vs. dexmedetomidine (MENDS) | More delirium-free and coma-free days with dexmedetomidine14 |
| Midazolam infusion > 48 h | Unpredictable wake-up time; accumulation of active metabolite |
When benzodiazepines are appropriate:
- Active seizures (first-line)
- Alcohol or sedative/hypnotic withdrawal (specific benzodiazepine protocols — see Part 5)
- Procedural anxiolysis/sedation (single dose)
- Refractory agitation not responding to non-benzodiazepine agents (rescue)
- Patients on chronic benzodiazepine therapy (continue at prior dose to avoid withdrawal)
- Anxiety disorders with documented benzodiazepine dependence
Medications That Increase Delirium Risk
The following medications should be reviewed and minimized in ICU patients at risk for delirium:1
| Class | High-Risk Examples | Alternatives |
|---|---|---|
| Benzodiazepines | Midazolam, lorazepam, diazepam | Dexmedetomidine, propofol for sedation |
| Anticholinergics | Diphenhydramine, promethazine, scopolamine, hydroxyzine, oxybutynin, atropine (systemic) | Ondansetron (for nausea); non-anticholinergic alternatives |
| Opioids (high dose / accumulation) | Meperidine (active metabolite normeperidine), morphine in renal failure | Fentanyl, hydromorphone; dose optimization |
| Corticosteroids (high dose) | Dexamethasone, methylprednisolone (pulse dose) | Use lowest effective dose; consider steroid taper |
| Fluoroquinolones | Ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin | Alternative antibiotic classes when possible |
| H2 receptor antagonists | Famotidine, ranitidine | Proton pump inhibitors (if acid suppression needed) |
Delirium Documentation and Communication
Recommended Documentation Elements
| Element | Details |
|---|---|
| Tool used | CAM-ICU or ICDSC |
| Result | Positive, Negative, or Unable to Assess (coma) |
| RASS at time of assessment | Document actual score |
| Delirium subtype | Hyperactive, hypoactive, or mixed |
| Likely contributing factors | Medications, metabolic, infection, sleep deprivation, etc. |
| Interventions initiated | Non-pharmacologic and pharmacologic (with doses) |
| Response to interventions | Improved, unchanged, worsened |
Handoff Communication for Delirium
Include in every nurse-to-nurse and nurse-to-provider handoff:
- Current delirium status (CAM-ICU/ICDSC result)
- Trend over past 24–48 hours
- Identified contributing factors
- Current management plan
- Outstanding workup (pending labs, imaging, medication review)
References
Devlin JW, Skrobik Y, Gélinas C, et al. “Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, and Sleep Disruption in Adult Patients in the ICU.” Crit Care Med. 2018;46(9):e825-e873. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003299 ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎
Ely EW, Inouye SK, Bernard GR, et al. “Delirium in Mechanically Ventilated Patients: Validity and Reliability of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU).” JAMA. 2001;286(21):2703-2710. DOI: 10.1001/jama.286.21.2703 ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎
Ely EW, Shintani A, Truman B, et al. “Delirium as a Predictor of Mortality in Mechanically Ventilated Patients in the Intensive Care Unit.” JAMA. 2004;291(14):1753-1762. DOI: 10.1001/jama.291.14.1753 ↩︎
Pandharipande PP, Girard TD, Jackson JC, et al. “Long-Term Cognitive Impairment After Critical Illness.” N Engl J Med. 2013;369(14):1306-1316. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1301372 ↩︎
Ely EW, Margolin R, Francis J, et al. “Evaluation of Delirium in Critically Ill Patients: Validation of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU).” Crit Care Med. 2001;29(7):1370-1379. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200107000-00012 ↩︎
Bergeron N, Dubois MJ, Dumont M, Dial S, Skrobik Y. “Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist: Evaluation of a New Screening Tool.” Intensive Care Med. 2001;27(5):859-864. DOI: 10.1007/s001340100909 ↩︎
Inouye SK, Bogardus ST Jr, Charpentier PA, et al. “A Multicomponent Intervention to Prevent Delirium in Hospitalized Older Patients.” N Engl J Med. 1999;340(9):669-676. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199903043400901 ↩︎ ↩︎
Duan X, Coburn M, Rossaint R, Sanders RD, Waesberghe JV, Kowark A. “Efficacy of Perioperative Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Delirium: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.” Br J Anaesth. 2018;121(2):384-397. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.04.046 ↩︎
DAS-Taskforce 2015, Baron R, Binder A, et al. “Evidence and Consensus Based Guideline for the Management of Delirium, Analgesia, and Sedation in Intensive Care Medicine (DAS-Guideline 2015).” Ger Med Sci. 2015;13:Doc19. DOI: 10.3205/000223 ↩︎
Girard TD, Exline MC, Carson SS, et al. “Haloperidol and Ziprasidone for Treatment of Delirium in Critical Illness.” N Engl J Med. 2018;379(26):2506-2516. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1808217 ↩︎ ↩︎
Andersen-Ranberg NC, Poulsen LM, Perner A, et al. “Haloperidol for the Treatment of Delirium in ICU Patients.” N Engl J Med. 2022;387(26):2425-2435. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2211868 ↩︎
Reade MC, Eastwood GM, Bellomo R, et al. “Effect of Dexmedetomidine Added to Standard Care on Ventilator-Free Time in Patients with Agitated Delirium: A Randomized Clinical Trial.” JAMA. 2016;315(14):1460-1468. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.2707 ↩︎ ↩︎
Riker RR, Shehabi Y, Bokesch PM, et al. “Dexmedetomidine vs Midazolam for Sedation of Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Trial.” JAMA. 2009;301(5):489-499. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2009.56 ↩︎
Pandharipande PP, Pun BT, Herr DL, et al. “Effect of Sedation with Dexmedetomidine vs Lorazepam on Acute Brain Dysfunction in Mechanically Ventilated Patients: The MENDS Randomized Controlled Trial.” JAMA. 2007;298(22):2644-2653. DOI: 10.1001/jama.298.22.2644 ↩︎