Part 2: Agitation and Sedation Assessment and Management

Comprehensive sedation assessment (RASS, SAS complete scoring tables), light sedation targets, sedative agent pharmacology and dosing (propofol, dexmedetomidine, midazolam, ketamine), propofol infusion syndrome, daily sedation interruption protocols, and nurse-driven sedation algorithms.

guidelinesMar 2026guidelines

Sedation Assessment

Routine, validated sedation assessment is the foundation of optimal sedation management. Sedation depth should be assessed at least every 2–4 hours and more frequently during titration (every 15–30 minutes). The two recommended scales are the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) and the Sedation-Agitation Scale (SAS).1 2

Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) — Complete Scoring Table

The RASS is a 10-point scale ranging from −5 (unarousable) to +4 (combative). It is the most widely used and validated sedation assessment tool in the ICU, with excellent interrater reliability (weighted kappa 0.91–0.94) across physicians, nurses, and other providers.1 3

ScoreTermDescriptionAssessment Method
+4CombativeOvertly combative or violent; immediate danger to staffObservation (no stimulation needed)
+3Very agitatedPulls on or removes tube(s) or catheter(s); aggressive toward staffObservation (no stimulation needed)
+2AgitatedFrequent non-purposeful movement; fights ventilatorObservation (no stimulation needed)
+1RestlessAnxious or apprehensive but movements not aggressive or vigorousObservation (no stimulation needed)
0Alert and calmSpontaneously pays attention to caregiverObservation (no stimulation needed)
−1DrowsyNot fully alert, but has sustained (> 10 seconds) awakening, with eye contact, to voiceVerbal stimulation: call patient’s name, ask to open eyes and look at speaker
−2Light sedationBriefly (< 10 seconds) awakens with eye contact to voiceVerbal stimulation
−3Moderate sedationAny movement (but no eye contact) to voiceVerbal stimulation
−4Deep sedationNo response to voice, but any movement to physical stimulationPhysical stimulation: sternal rub or trapezius squeeze
−5UnarousableNo response to voice or physical stimulationPhysical stimulation

RASS Assessment Protocol (Step-by-Step):

  1. Observe the patient for 30 seconds without stimulation

    • If the patient is alert, restless, agitated, or combative → score +1 to +4
    • If the patient is calm and alert → score 0
  2. If not alert, use verbal stimulation — say the patient’s name and ask them to open their eyes and look at you

    • Eye contact sustained > 10 seconds → score −1
    • Eye contact sustained < 10 seconds → score −2
    • Movement but no eye contact → score −3
  3. If no response to verbal stimulation, use physical stimulation — apply sternal rub or trapezius squeeze

    • Any movement to physical stimulation → score −4
    • No response to physical stimulation → score −5

Sedation-Agitation Scale (SAS) — Complete Scoring Table

The SAS is a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (unarousable) to 7 (dangerous agitation). It has good interrater reliability (weighted kappa 0.92) and correlates well with RASS.1 4

ScoreTermDescription
7Dangerous agitationPulling at endotracheal tube, trying to remove catheters, climbing over bedrail, striking at staff, thrashing side-to-side
6Very agitatedRequiring restraint and frequent verbal reminding of limits; biting endotracheal tube
5AgitatedAnxious or physically agitated; calms to verbal instructions
4Calm and cooperativeCalm; awakens easily; follows commands
3SedatedDifficult to arouse; awakens to verbal stimuli or gentle shaking but drifts off again; follows simple commands
2Very sedatedArouses to physical stimuli but does not communicate or follow commands; may move spontaneously
1UnarousableMinimal or no response to noxious stimuli; does not communicate or follow commands

RASS-to-SAS Correlation

RASSSASClinical State
+47Dangerous agitation
+36Very agitated
+25Agitated
+15Restless
04Alert and calm / Calm and cooperative
−13Drowsy / Sedated
−23Light sedation
−32Moderate sedation
−4 to −51–2Deep sedation to unarousable

Choosing a Sedation Target

The 2018 guidelines strongly recommend targeting light sedation (RASS 0 to −2, SAS 3–4) for most mechanically ventilated ICU patients, unless there is a specific clinical indication for deeper sedation.1 2

Evidence for Light Sedation

OutcomeLight vs. Deep SedationReference
Duration of mechanical ventilationReduced by 2.0–3.5 daysMultiple RCTs5 6
ICU length of stayReduced by 2.0–4.0 daysMultiple RCTs5 6
Tracheostomy rateReducedObservational data
Delirium incidenceReduced by 30–50%Meta-analyses
Self-extubation rateNo significant increase with protocolized approachMultiple RCTs
90-day mortalityReduced (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.36–0.99 in one landmark trial)Strøm et al.5
Long-term cognitive functionImprovedObservational data
Post-traumatic stress disorderMixed evidence; may be increased with recall of frightening experiencesObservational data

Indications for Deeper Sedation (RASS −3 to −5)

Clinical IndicationTarget RASSRationale
Severe ARDS with prone positioning−3 to −4Prevent self-extubation; reduce oxygen consumption; facilitate prone compliance
Therapeutic hypothermia / targeted temperature management−4 to −5Prevent shivering; reduce metabolic demand
Refractory intracranial hypertension−4 to −5Reduce cerebral metabolic rate; reduce ICP
Status epilepticus (burst suppression)−5Achieve seizure cessation
Neuromuscular blockade in use−4 to −5Ensure awareness is prevented during paralysis
Open abdomen−3 to −4Prevent increases in intra-abdominal pressure
Severe agitation refractory to other measures−3Short-term deeper sedation for safety, with plan for reassessment and lightening

Recommendation: Reassess the need for deep sedation at least daily and lighten sedation as soon as clinically feasible.1


Sedative and Analgesic Agents for Sedation

Agent Selection Principles

The 2018 guidelines recommend:1 2

  1. Analgesia-first approach — treat pain before adding sedation
  2. Prefer non-benzodiazepine agents (propofol or dexmedetomidine) over benzodiazepines for sedation in mechanically ventilated adults (conditional recommendation)
  3. Avoid benzodiazepines as first-line sedation — associated with increased delirium, prolonged ventilation, and longer ICU stay
  4. Use the minimum effective dose for the shortest duration

Propofol

ParameterDetails
MechanismGABA-A receptor agonist; enhances inhibitory neurotransmission
Onset1–2 minutes
Offset5–10 minutes (after short infusions); prolonged offset after prolonged use due to redistribution from fatty tissues
Bolus dose5–20 mcg/kg/min (0.3–1.2 mg/kg/h) boluses rarely used for sedation in ICU; if needed for emergent control: 0.25–0.5 mg/kg IV push
Infusion range5–80 mcg/kg/min (0.3–4.8 mg/kg/h); typical starting dose 5–10 mcg/kg/min
TargetTitrate to RASS 0 to −2
Maximum recommended dose80 mcg/kg/min; doses > 70 mcg/kg/min for > 48 hours increase propofol infusion syndrome (PRIS) risk
AdvantagesRapid onset/offset; easily titratable; no active metabolites; reduces ICP; antiemetic properties; anticonvulsant at high doses
DisadvantagesHypotension (dose-dependent vasodilation and myocardial depression); respiratory depression; hypertriglyceridemia (lipid emulsion delivers 1.1 kcal/mL); PRIS risk; no analgesic properties; requires dedicated IV line
MonitoringTriglycerides q 24–48 h (hold if > 400–500 mg/dL); CK, lactate, electrolytes if PRIS suspected; hemodynamics
Caloric content1.1 kcal/mL from lipid emulsion — must be counted in nutrition calculations

Propofol Infusion Syndrome (PRIS)

PRIS is a rare but potentially fatal complication of propofol infusion. Incidence is estimated at 1–4% when doses exceed 70 mcg/kg/min for more than 48 hours.7

Risk factors:

  • High infusion rates (> 70 mcg/kg/min or > 4.2 mg/kg/h)
  • Duration > 48 hours
  • Concomitant catecholamine or corticosteroid use
  • Critical illness with high catecholamine state
  • Traumatic brain injury
  • Pediatric patients (higher susceptibility)
  • Low carbohydrate intake

Clinical features of PRIS (diagnosis requires ≥ 2 of the following):

FeatureDetails
Metabolic acidosisUnexplained lactic acidosis (base deficit > 10 mEq/L)
RhabdomyolysisElevated CK (often > 10,000 U/L); myoglobinuria
HypertriglyceridemiaLipemic serum; triglycerides > 500 mg/dL
Cardiac dysfunctionBrugada-like ECG pattern; bradycardia; conduction abnormalities; cardiac failure; asystole
Renal failureAcute kidney injury secondary to myoglobinuria
Hepatomegaly / liver failureElevated transaminases; fatty liver
HyperkalemiaFrom rhabdomyolysis and impaired mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation

PRIS prevention:

  • Limit propofol to ≤ 70 mcg/kg/min (4.2 mg/kg/h)
  • Limit duration when possible; consider alternatives for prolonged sedation (> 48–72 h)
  • Ensure adequate carbohydrate intake (≥ 6–8 mg/kg/min glucose)
  • Monitor triglycerides, CK, and lactate every 24–48 hours
  • Monitor for unexplained metabolic acidosis

PRIS management:

  • Immediately discontinue propofol
  • Aggressive IV fluid resuscitation
  • Hemodynamic support (vasopressors, inotropes)
  • Correct hyperkalemia, acidosis, and electrolyte abnormalities
  • Consider renal replacement therapy for refractory acidosis, hyperkalemia, or rhabdomyolysis-related AKI
  • Switch to alternative sedation (dexmedetomidine, midazolam, ketamine)
  • Mortality: 18–33% even with early recognition and treatment

Dexmedetomidine

ParameterDetails
MechanismSelective alpha-2 adrenergic agonist (alpha-2:alpha-1 selectivity ratio 1,620:1); activates receptors in the locus coeruleus producing sedation that mimics natural sleep; analgesic properties via spinal cord alpha-2 receptors
Onset5–10 minutes (without loading dose); peak effect at 15–30 minutes
Offset30–60 minutes after discontinuation
Loading dose0.5–1.0 mcg/kg IV over 10–20 minutes (often omitted in hemodynamically unstable patients due to bradycardia/hypotension risk)
Infusion range0.2–1.5 mcg/kg/h; starting dose 0.2–0.4 mcg/kg/h
Maximum dose1.5 mcg/kg/h (higher doses used off-label for alcohol withdrawal, up to 2.5 mcg/kg/h)
AdvantagesArousable sedation (cooperative sedation — patient can follow commands while sedated); no respiratory depression at typical doses; reduces delirium incidence compared to benzodiazepines and propofol; analgesic-sparing (reduces opioid requirements by 30–50%); anti-shivering properties; anxiolytic; reduces sympathetic response
DisadvantagesBradycardia (incidence 5–20%); hypotension (incidence 15–30%); limited depth of sedation achievable (max ~RASS −3); slow onset; more expensive than propofol or midazolam; rebound hypertension and tachycardia with abrupt discontinuation after prolonged use; dry mouth
ContraindicationsAdvanced heart block (2nd or 3rd degree) without pacemaker; heart rate < 50 bpm; use with caution if SBP < 90 mmHg or on high-dose vasopressors
MonitoringHeart rate (watch for bradycardia < 50); blood pressure; sedation level (RASS)

Key trial evidence:

TrialFinding
MENDS (2007)Dexmedetomidine vs. lorazepam: more delirium-free and coma-free days; reduced 28-day mortality in sepsis subgroup8
SEDCOM (2009)Dexmedetomidine vs. midazolam: shorter time to extubation (3.7 vs. 5.6 days); lower delirium prevalence (54% vs. 76.6%)9
DahLIA (2016)Dexmedetomidine for delirium resolution in ventilated patients: faster delirium resolution; more ventilator-free hours10
SPICE III (2019)Dexmedetomidine as sole or primary sedation vs. usual care: no difference in 90-day mortality; more hypotension and bradycardia11

Midazolam

ParameterDetails
MechanismBenzodiazepine; potentiates GABA-A receptor activity
Onset2–5 minutes
OffsetVariable; 1–2 hours after short use; highly unpredictable after prolonged use (days to weeks) due to active metabolite accumulation and lipophilic redistribution
Bolus dose0.01–0.05 mg/kg IV (0.5–4 mg) q 15 min–1 h PRN
Infusion range0.02–0.1 mg/kg/h (1–7 mg/h); starting dose 1–2 mg/h
Active metaboliteAlpha-hydroxymidazolam — 50% activity of parent compound; renally cleared; accumulates in renal impairment
AdvantagesRapid onset; amnestic; anticonvulsant; anxiolytic; reversible with flumazenil; inexpensive
DisadvantagesIncreases delirium (strongest evidence among all sedatives); prolongs mechanical ventilation; unpredictable offset with prolonged use; tolerance and dependence develop rapidly; paradoxical agitation (especially elderly); respiratory depression; accumulation in obesity, hepatic failure, and renal failure
When to useActive seizures (first-line); acute severe agitation refractory to non-benzodiazepine agents (rescue); alcohol withdrawal (often better managed with alternative agents in ICU); procedural sedation (single dose)
When to avoidFirst-line ICU sedation; prolonged infusion (> 48 h); elderly patients; patients at high delirium risk; hepatic or renal failure

Ketamine for Sedation

ParameterDetails
MechanismNMDA receptor antagonist; also acts at opioid, monoaminergic, cholinergic, and sigma receptors
Onset30 seconds–1 minute IV
Offset10–20 minutes (emergence from dissociation)
Sub-dissociative/analgesic dose0.1–0.5 mg/kg/h (see Part 1)
Sedation dose0.5–2 mg/kg/h; bolus for induction: 1–2 mg/kg IV
AdvantagesMaintains airway reflexes and respiratory drive; bronchodilator; sympathomimetic (supports hemodynamics); analgesic; no histamine release; useful in refractory status asthmaticus; may reduce delirium compared to benzodiazepines
DisadvantagesEmergence reactions (vivid dreams, hallucinations, dysphoria — 10–30%, reduced by concurrent benzodiazepine or dexmedetomidine); increased secretions (co-administer glycopyrrolate 0.2 mg IV if needed); increases heart rate and blood pressure (disadvantage in myocardial ischemia); historically cautioned in raised ICP but evidence does not support this concern in ventilated patients
Emerging roleIncreasingly used as adjunct sedation to reduce propofol/opioid requirements (“ketafol” approach); sedation in burn patients; refractory status epilepticus; hemodynamically unstable patients needing sedation for intubation or procedures

Sedative Agent Comparison Summary

FeaturePropofolDexmedetomidineMidazolamKetamine
Onset1–2 min5–10 min2–5 min< 1 min
Offset5–10 min30–60 minVariable (hours–days)10–20 min
Depth achievableRASS −5RASS −3 (max)RASS −5RASS −5 (dissociation)
Respiratory depressionYesNo (at typical doses)YesNo (preserves drive)
Hemodynamic effectsHypotensionBradycardia, hypotensionMinimal at low dosesSympathomimetic (increases HR/BP)
Delirium riskModerateLowestHighestLow-Moderate
Analgesic propertiesNoneMild-ModerateNoneStrong
Cost (relative)LowHighLowModerate
Preferred first-lineYes (< 72 h)Yes (light sedation, extubation facilitation)NoAdjunct role

Sedative Selection Algorithm

Is the patient intubated and expected to require sedation > 72 hours?
├── YES → Dexmedetomidine (if light sedation target achievable)
│         OR Propofol (monitor for PRIS, TG q 24–48 h)
│         Consider ketamine as adjunct to reduce doses of either
│         AVOID midazolam as routine infusion
│
└── NO (< 72 hours expected)
    ├── Light sedation needed (RASS 0 to −2)?
    │   → Dexmedetomidine or propofol (either first-line)
    │
    ├── Deep sedation needed (RASS −3 to −5)?
    │   → Propofol first-line (achieves deeper sedation)
    │   → Add ketamine if hemodynamically unstable
    │   → Midazolam ONLY if propofol contraindicated AND dexmedetomidine inadequate
    │
    └── Hemodynamically unstable?
        → Ketamine (sympathomimetic)
        → Midazolam (less hemodynamic depression than propofol)
        → Dexmedetomidine with caution (avoid loading dose)
        → Propofol at low dose with vasopressor support

Daily Sedation Interruption — Spontaneous Awakening Trials (SAT)

Rationale

Daily sedation interruption (also known as spontaneous awakening trial, or SAT) involves temporarily stopping all sedative and analgesic infusions each day to reassess the patient’s neurologic status, pain, agitation, and need for continued sedation. When paired with a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT), the “wake up and breathe” protocol significantly improves outcomes.5 12

SAT Safety Screen

Before initiating an SAT, a safety screen must be passed. The SAT is contraindicated if any of the following are present:

Safety Screen CriterionRationale
Active seizuresSedation required for seizure suppression
Alcohol or substance withdrawal requiring escalating sedationRisk of withdrawal crisis
Receiving neuromuscular blocking agentsMust not awaken during paralysis
Myocardial ischemia within prior 24 hoursSympathetic surge may worsen ischemia
Intracranial pressure elevation (ICP > 20 mmHg)Agitation increases ICP
Actively requiring deep sedation for clinical indicationSee deep sedation indications above

SAT Protocol

  1. Pass the safety screen (see above)
  2. Stop all continuous sedative and analgesic infusions at a designated time each morning (typically 06:00–08:00)
  3. Observe for up to 4 hours (or until patient meets failure criteria)
  4. Assess for wakefulness: patient is considered awake if they open eyes to voice, follow simple commands, or have RASS ≥ −1
  5. If patient tolerates the SAT: proceed immediately to an SBT (spontaneous breathing trial)
  6. If the SAT fails (see criteria below): restart sedation at half the previous rate and titrate to the targeted RASS

SAT Failure Criteria

Restart sedation at 50% of the prior rate if any of the following occur:

Failure CriterionDefinition
Sustained anxiety or agitationRASS ≥ +2 for > 5 minutes
Respiratory distressRR > 35/min for > 5 min, SpO2 < 88% for > 5 min, acute respiratory distress
Self-extubation or device removalUnplanned removal of ETT, central line, chest tube, or other critical device
New cardiac arrhythmiaNew atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia, or other hemodynamically significant arrhythmia

Paired SAT-SBT Protocol (“Wake Up and Breathe”)

The landmark ABC Trial demonstrated that pairing daily SAT with SBT, compared to SBT alone, resulted in:12

  • 3.1 more ventilator-free days (14.7 vs. 11.6 days; p = 0.02)
  • 4 fewer ICU days
  • Reduced 1-year mortality (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.50–0.92; p = 0.01)
  • No increase in self-extubation

Coordinated SAT + SBT Protocol:

Step 1: SAT Safety Screen → PASS
Step 2: Stop all sedative/analgesic infusions
Step 3: Wait for patient to awaken (RASS ≥ −1)
   → If SAT fails → Restart at 50% dose, reassess next day
   → If SAT passes → Proceed to Step 4
Step 4: SBT Safety Screen → PASS
Step 5: SBT (T-piece, CPAP 5, or PSV 5–8 / PEEP 5 for 30–120 min)
   → If SBT fails → Return to prior ventilator settings; sedation PRN
   → If SBT passes → Assess for extubation readiness
Step 6: Evaluate for extubation
   → Positive cuff leak (if applicable)
   → Ability to protect airway
   → Manageable secretions
   → Extubate

Nurse-Driven Sedation Protocol

Nurse-driven sedation protocols empower bedside nurses to titrate sedation to achieve and maintain a physician-ordered RASS target. Implementation of nurse-driven sedation protocols has been associated with reduced duration of mechanical ventilation, shorter ICU stays, and decreased sedative use.1 13

Example Nurse-Driven Sedation Protocol

Prerequisites:

  • Physician order specifying: target RASS, preferred sedative agent, initial infusion rate, and titration parameters
  • Pain assessed and treated first (BPS < 5 or CPOT < 3)

Assessment schedule:

  • RASS every 2 hours (minimum)
  • RASS every 15–30 minutes during active titration
  • BPS/CPOT/NRS at each RASS assessment

Titration rules (propofol example):

Patient RASS vs. TargetAction
≥ 2 points above target (more agitated)Administer bolus (10–20 mcg/kg/min for 5 min); increase infusion by 10 mcg/kg/min; reassess in 15 min
1 point above targetIncrease infusion by 5–10 mcg/kg/min; reassess in 30 min
At targetNo change; reassess in 2 h
1 point below targetDecrease infusion by 5–10 mcg/kg/min; reassess in 30 min
≥ 2 points below target (more sedated)Hold infusion for 15–30 min; restart at 50% of previous rate; reassess in 15 min; notify provider if RASS remains ≥ 2 below target after 1 h

Titration rules (dexmedetomidine example):

Patient RASS vs. TargetAction
≥ 2 points above targetIncrease by 0.2 mcg/kg/h; consider rescue bolus of alternative agent (propofol 10–20 mg or fentanyl 25–50 mcg); reassess in 15 min
1 point above targetIncrease by 0.1–0.2 mcg/kg/h; reassess in 30 min
At targetNo change; reassess in 2 h
1 point below targetDecrease by 0.1–0.2 mcg/kg/h; reassess in 30 min
≥ 2 points below targetHold infusion; reassess in 15–30 min; restart at 50% dose; notify provider if HR < 50 or SBP < 80
Adverse EventSignsImmediate Action
Over-sedation (RASS < target)Unresponsive to voice; RR < 8; hypotensionHold sedation; reassess pain; restart at reduced rate when RASS returns to target
Under-sedation / agitation (RASS > target)Self-removal of devices; patient-ventilator asynchrony; tachycardiaRule out pain, delirium, hypoxia, full bladder, and other reversible causes BEFORE escalating sedation
Propofol-related hypotensionSBP < 90; MAP < 65; new vasopressor requirementReduce rate by 50%; consider fluid bolus; switch to alternative if persistent
Dexmedetomidine bradycardiaHR < 50Hold or reduce infusion; atropine 0.5 mg IV if symptomatic; consider alternative agent
Benzodiazepine over-sedationProlonged unresponsiveness; respiratory depressionFlumazenil 0.2 mg IV q 1 min (max 1 mg); caution in benzodiazepine-dependent patients (seizure risk)
Emergence delirium (ketamine)Agitation, hallucinations, dysphoria on emergenceLow-dose midazolam (1–2 mg IV) or dexmedetomidine; reassurance; dim lights; reduce stimulation

Neuromuscular Blocking Agents (NMBA) — Considerations

NMBAs are occasionally required in the ICU for specific indications. When NMBAs are used, adequate sedation and analgesia must be assured because the patient cannot communicate distress. The following principles apply:1 14

PrincipleDetails
Sedation depthTarget RASS −4 to −5 before initiating NMBA; continue monitoring with processed EEG (BIS) if available
Pain managementEnsure adequate analgesia — pain assessment tools (BPS, CPOT) are unreliable during paralysis
IndicationsSevere ARDS (early, for 48 h, when P/F < 150 with optimal ventilator settings); to facilitate prone positioning; to manage refractory ICP; during therapeutic hypothermia (prevent shivering); to reduce oxygen consumption in shock
Train-of-four (TOF) monitoringTarget 1–2 twitches out of 4 to avoid over-paralysis; assess q 4–6 h
DurationUse for the shortest duration possible; reassess need at least q 12 h
Drug holidayConsider daily interruption of NMBA to reassess underlying sedation and need for continued paralysis
ICUAW riskProlonged NMBA use (especially with concurrent corticosteroids) increases risk of ICU-acquired weakness; minimize duration

Common NMBA Dosing in the ICU

AgentBolusInfusionMetabolismConsiderations
Cisatracurium0.1–0.2 mg/kg1–3 mcg/kg/minHofmann elimination (organ-independent)Preferred in hepatic/renal failure; does not cause histamine release
Rocuronium0.6–1.2 mg/kg4–16 mcg/kg/minHepaticReversible with sugammadex; onset faster than cisatracurium; may accumulate in liver failure
Vecuronium0.08–0.1 mg/kg0.8–1.2 mcg/kg/minHepatic (active metabolite)Active metabolite (3-desacetylvecuronium) accumulates in renal failure; less preferred

References


  1. Devlin JW, Skrobik Y, Gélinas C, et al. “Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, and Sleep Disruption in Adult Patients in the ICU.” Crit Care Med. 2018;46(9):e825-e873. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003299 ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎

  2. Barr J, Fraser GL, Puntillo K, et al. “Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Pain, Agitation, and Delirium in Adult Patients in the Intensive Care Unit.” Crit Care Med. 2013;41(1):263-306. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182783b72 ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎

  3. Sessler CN, Gosnell MS, Grap MJ, et al. “The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale: Validity and Reliability in Adult Intensive Care Unit Patients.” Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166(10):1338-1344. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.2107138 ↩︎

  4. Riker RR, Picard JT, Fraser GL. “Prospective Evaluation of the Sedation-Agitation Scale for Adult Critically Ill Patients.” Crit Care Med. 1999;27(7):1325-1329. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199907000-00022 ↩︎

  5. Strøm T, Martinussen T, Toft P. “A Protocol of No Sedation for Critically Ill Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation: A Randomised Trial.” Lancet. 2010;375(9713):475-480. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62072-9 ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎

  6. Shehabi Y, Bellomo R, Reade MC, et al. “Early Intensive Care Sedation Predicts Long-Term Mortality in Ventilated Critically Ill Patients.” Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;186(8):724-731. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201203-0522OC ↩︎ ↩︎

  7. Hemphill S, McMenamin L, Bellamy MC, Hopkins PM. “Propofol Infusion Syndrome: A Structured Literature Review and Analysis of Published Case Reports.” Br J Anaesth. 2019;122(4):448-459. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.12.025 ↩︎

  8. Pandharipande PP, Pun BT, Herr DL, et al. “Effect of Sedation with Dexmedetomidine vs Lorazepam on Acute Brain Dysfunction in Mechanically Ventilated Patients: The MENDS Randomized Controlled Trial.” JAMA. 2007;298(22):2644-2653. DOI: 10.1001/jama.298.22.2644 ↩︎

  9. Riker RR, Shehabi Y, Bokesch PM, et al. “Dexmedetomidine vs Midazolam for Sedation of Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Trial.” JAMA. 2009;301(5):489-499. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2009.56 ↩︎

  10. Reade MC, Eastwood GM, Bellomo R, et al. “Effect of Dexmedetomidine Added to Standard Care on Ventilator-Free Time in Patients with Agitated Delirium: A Randomized Clinical Trial.” JAMA. 2016;315(14):1460-1468. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.2707 ↩︎

  11. Shehabi Y, Howe BD, Bellomo R, et al. “Early Sedation with Dexmedetomidine in Critically Ill Patients.” N Engl J Med. 2019;380(26):2506-2517. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1904710 ↩︎

  12. Girard TD, Kress JP, Fuchs BD, et al. “Efficacy and Safety of a Paired Sedation and Ventilator Weaning Protocol for Mechanically Ventilated Patients in Intensive Care (Awakening and Breathing Controlled Trial): A Randomised Controlled Trial.” Lancet. 2008;371(9607):126-134. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60105-1 ↩︎ ↩︎

  13. Brook AD, Ahrens TS, Schaiff R, et al. “Effect of a Nursing-Implemented Sedation Protocol on the Duration of Mechanical Ventilation.” Crit Care Med. 1999;27(12):2609-2615. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199912000-00001 ↩︎

  14. Papazian L, Forel JM, Gacouin A, et al. “Neuromuscular Blockers in Early Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.” N Engl J Med. 2010;363(12):1107-1116. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1005372 ↩︎