Part 3: Supplemental Prevention Strategies, Diagnosis & Management of CRBSI
Antimicrobial-impregnated catheters, antimicrobial lock therapy, CHG-impregnated dressings, antibiotic ointments, diagnosis of CRBSI (paired blood cultures, differential time to positivity, catheter tip culture), empiric therapy, catheter removal vs salvage, duration of therapy by organism, and suppurative thrombophlebitis.
1. Supplemental Prevention Strategies
The following strategies are recommended as supplemental approaches — to be considered when CLABSI rates remain elevated despite full implementation of and high compliance with the standard insertion and maintenance bundles, or in specific high-risk patient populations.12
1.1 Antimicrobial-Impregnated Catheters
Antimicrobial-impregnated or -coated central venous catheters deliver antimicrobial agents at the catheter surface to inhibit microbial adhesion and biofilm formation. Two primary types have been extensively studied:34
1.1.1 Chlorhexidine–Silver Sulfadiazine (CHG-SS) Catheters
Description: First-generation CHG-SS catheters coat only the external surface; second-generation catheters coat both internal and external surfaces with higher concentrations of chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine.
| Feature | Details |
|---|---|
| Active agents | Chlorhexidine gluconate + silver sulfadiazine |
| Coating surface | First-generation: external only; second-generation: internal and external |
| Duration of antimicrobial activity | Approximately 7–10 days for first-generation; up to 21–28 days for second-generation |
| Spectrum | Broad-spectrum: gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, Candida spp. |
Evidence:
- First-generation (external only) CHG-SS catheters reduce catheter colonization and CLABSI in patients with catheters in place for <7–10 days (meta-analysis: relative risk of CLABSI approximately 0.44)3
- Second-generation (internal + external) catheters provide more sustained activity and are effective for longer catheter dwell times4
- CHG-SS catheters are less effective than minocycline-rifampin catheters in head-to-head comparative trials5
1.1.2 Minocycline-Rifampin (M-R) Catheters
Description: Both the internal and external surfaces of the catheter are impregnated with minocycline and rifampin.
| Feature | Details |
|---|---|
| Active agents | Minocycline + rifampin |
| Coating surface | Internal and external |
| Duration of antimicrobial activity | Up to 25–30 days |
| Spectrum | Broad-spectrum: excellent activity against gram-positive organisms (including MRSA, VRE); good gram-negative coverage; limited antifungal activity |
Evidence:
- A randomized controlled trial directly comparing M-R catheters with first-generation CHG-SS catheters demonstrated a threefold reduction in catheter colonization and CLABSI with M-R catheters5
- Meta-analytic data confirm that M-R catheters reduce CLABSI by approximately 55–70% compared with standard noncoated catheters4
- Concern about promoting rifampin resistance has not been substantiated in clinical studies, though monitoring is warranted
- M-R catheters are more expensive than standard catheters but are cost-effective when baseline CLABSI rates exceed approximately 2 per 1,000 catheter-days1
1.1.3 When to Use Antimicrobial-Impregnated Catheters
| Scenario | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| CLABSI rate remains above institutional target despite full bundle compliance | Use antimicrobial-impregnated catheters as a supplemental measure |
| High-risk patient populations (burn ICU, high-acuity surgical ICU, prolonged neutropenia) | Consider routine use |
| Expected catheter dwell time >5 days | May be beneficial (particularly M-R catheters) |
| CLABSI rate already at or near zero with standard bundles | Antimicrobial catheters unlikely to provide additional benefit; may not be cost-effective |
| Short-term expected use (<48 hours) | Generally not indicated |
1.2 Antimicrobial Lock Therapy for Prevention (Prophylactic Lock Solutions)
Antimicrobial lock therapy involves instilling a concentrated antimicrobial solution into the catheter lumen during periods of non-use (dwell time typically 8–24 hours) to prevent intraluminal biofilm formation and CLABSI.16
1.2.1 Agents for Prophylactic Antimicrobial Lock
| Agent | Concentration | Evidence | Key Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ethanol (70%) | 70% ethanol lock, dwell 2–24 hours | Moderate evidence for CLABSI reduction in hemodialysis and long-term catheters; broad-spectrum including biofilm activity | Catheter compatibility concerns (may damage polyurethane catheters; silicone generally compatible); risk of systemic effects if lock solution enters circulation |
| Taurolidine (1.35%) | 1.35% taurolidine-based lock solution | Multiple RCTs demonstrating 50–80% CLABSI reduction in hemodialysis catheters; broad-spectrum, low resistance potential | Well-tolerated; low toxicity; minimal systemic antibiotic pressure; available commercially in combination with citrate |
| Citrate (4–46.7%) | 4% trisodium citrate (anticoagulant + antimicrobial) | Some evidence for CLABSI reduction; also provides anticoagulant function | High-concentration citrate (>30%) has been associated with rare but serious adverse events (cardiac arrest, hypocalcemia); low-concentration (4%) citrate has a better safety profile but less antimicrobial activity |
| Antibiotic lock (various) | Vancomycin, gentamicin, cefazolin, ceftazidime, or minocycline in combination with heparin or EDTA | Evidence from multiple RCTs, particularly in hemodialysis and oncology populations; 40–70% CLABSI reduction | Risk of promoting antibiotic resistance; generally reserved for patients with recurrent CLABSI or limited vascular access; not recommended as routine first-line prevention1 |
1.2.2 Indications for Prophylactic Lock Therapy
- Patients with long-term central venous catheters (tunneled catheters, implanted ports) who have experienced recurrent CLABSI despite optimal catheter care
- Hemodialysis catheter-dependent patients with high CLABSI rates despite adherence to dialysis catheter care guidelines
- Patients with limited remaining vascular access sites in whom catheter preservation is critical
- Not recommended as a routine measure for all short-term ICU central venous catheters12
1.3 CHG-Impregnated Sponge Dressings
As discussed in Part 2, chlorhexidine-impregnated sponge or gel pad dressings placed at the catheter insertion site provide continuous local antisepsis and have been shown in randomized trials to reduce catheter colonization and CRBSI by 50–65%.78
Recommendation: Use CHG-impregnated dressings for central venous catheters in patients older than 2 months of age, particularly when CLABSI rates are not decreasing despite implementation of the basic bundle, or in units with high baseline CLABSI rates.12
1.4 Antibiotic Ointments at the Insertion Site
Recommendation: Apply povidone-iodine antiseptic ointment or bacitracin/gramicidin/polymyxin B ointment to the hemodialysis catheter exit site at the time of catheter insertion and at each dressing change, unless the ointment is incompatible with the catheter material (manufacturer recommendations should be checked). Do not use antibiotic ointments at non-hemodialysis central line insertion sites, as they may promote fungal infections and antimicrobial resistance.3
| Ointment | Indication | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Povidone-iodine ointment | Hemodialysis catheter exit site | Randomized trials in hemodialysis populations demonstrate reduced exit-site infection and CRBSI3 |
| Bacitracin/gramicidin/polymyxin B | Hemodialysis catheter exit site | Some evidence for reduced exit-site colonization |
| Mupirocin ointment | Not recommended for catheter exit sites | May promote mupirocin resistance; some manufacturers warn against use with polyurethane catheters |
| Any antibiotic ointment at non-HD CVC sites | Not recommended | Potential promotion of fungal infections and resistance |
2. Diagnosis of Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection (CRBSI)
2.1 When to Suspect CRBSI
CRBSI should be suspected in any patient with a central venous catheter who develops:
- Fever (temperature ≥38.3 C) or hypothermia (temperature <36.0 C) without another obvious source
- Chills or rigors, especially occurring within 1–2 hours after catheter manipulation or flushing
- Hemodynamic instability (new hypotension, tachycardia) without other explanation
- Local signs at the catheter insertion site: erythema, tenderness, purulent drainage, induration
- New-onset sepsis or septic shock in a patient with a central line as the most likely source
- Positive blood culture drawn from the catheter or peripherally in a patient with a central line, without an identified alternative source39
Important: Not all CLABSIs are CRBSIs, and not all bloodstream infections in patients with central lines are catheter-related. Clinical judgment combined with microbiologic data is essential to determine whether the catheter is truly the source.
2.2 Diagnostic Methods
2.2.1 Paired Blood Cultures (Peripheral and Catheter-Drawn)
Recommended as the first-line diagnostic approach when CRBSI is suspected and catheter retention is desired.
- Draw at least two sets of blood cultures: one from a peripheral vein (by percutaneous venipuncture) and one from the catheter hub/lumen
- Each set should contain both an aerobic and an anaerobic bottle
- Cultures should be drawn simultaneously (or within a short time window) and before initiation of empiric antibiotics whenever possible
- The samples should be of adequate volume (20 mL per set in adults: 10 mL per bottle)
- Label each culture with the draw site (peripheral vs. catheter lumen, specifying which lumen in multilumen catheters)910
2.2.2 Differential Time to Positivity (DTP)
This is the most practical method for diagnosing CRBSI without requiring catheter removal.
| Parameter | Definition |
|---|---|
| Principle | If the catheter is the source of bacteremia, the microbial burden in catheter-drawn blood will be higher than in peripheral blood, causing the catheter-drawn culture to turn positive earlier |
| Diagnostic criterion | The catheter-drawn blood culture becomes positive ≥2 hours before the peripheral blood culture (using a continuous-monitoring blood culture system) |
| Sensitivity | 85–91% |
| Specificity | 85–92% |
| Positive predictive value | 79–93% (varies by prevalence) |
| Negative predictive value | 89–97% |
Important considerations:
- DTP is most reliable when cultures are drawn simultaneously and processed in the same automated blood culture system
- DTP is not valid if the patient has received antibiotics through the catheter before the cultures were drawn (antibiotic activity in the lumen can delay time to positivity)
- DTP applies to short-term nontunneled catheters; its accuracy for long-term tunneled catheters and ports is less well established1011
2.2.3 Catheter Tip Culture (Post-Removal)
Performed when the catheter has been removed and CRBSI is suspected.
| Method | Technique | Positive Threshold | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-quantitative (Maki roll-plate) | The distal 5-cm catheter tip segment is rolled across a blood agar plate using sterile forceps (4 rolls) | ≥15 CFU | Most widely used; detects extraluminal colonization; does not detect intraluminal organisms; sensitivity approximately 85% for short-term catheters12 |
| Quantitative (sonication/vortexing) | The catheter segment is sonicated or vortexed in broth to dislodge organisms from both internal and external surfaces; the broth is then quantitatively plated | ≥10^3 CFU | More sensitive than roll-plate; detects both intraluminal and extraluminal organisms; preferred for long-term catheters |
CRBSI is diagnosed when:
- The same organism is isolated from both the catheter tip (by semi-quantitative or quantitative culture meeting the threshold) and a peripheral blood culture
- No other source of infection is identified
Important notes on catheter tip culture:
- The catheter tip should be sent for culture only when CRBSI is clinically suspected — do not routinely culture catheter tips upon removal, as this leads to unnecessary antibiotic use and does not improve outcomes
- The catheter tip should be cut with sterile scissors and transported in a sterile, dry container (not in liquid broth, which may yield false-positive results)
- Do not culture the catheter tip after applying antiseptic to the external surface, as this may yield false-negative results312
2.2.4 Quantitative Catheter-Drawn Blood Cultures
When paired with peripheral quantitative cultures, a catheter-to-peripheral colony count ratio of ≥3:1 (or ≥5:1 by some criteria) supports the diagnosis of CRBSI. This method requires quantitative blood culture capability, which is not available in all clinical microbiology laboratories.10
2.3 Diagnostic Algorithm
Patient with central line + suspected bloodstream infection
│
├── Can catheter be removed?
│ │
│ ├── YES → Remove catheter → Send catheter tip for
│ │ semi-quantitative or quantitative culture
│ │ + Draw 2 sets of peripheral blood cultures
│ │ → CRBSI confirmed if same organism from
│ │ catheter tip (≥15 CFU) AND peripheral blood
│ │
│ └── NO (catheter salvage desired)
│ │
│ └── Draw PAIRED blood cultures simultaneously:
│ 1 set from catheter, 1 set from peripheral vein
│ → Assess differential time to positivity (DTP)
│ → CRBSI supported if catheter-drawn culture
│ positive ≥2 hours before peripheral culture
│
└── Start empiric antibiotics after cultures drawn
(do NOT delay therapy for diagnostic workup)
3. Management of Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection
3.1 General Principles
- Obtain blood cultures (paired peripheral and catheter-drawn) before initiating empiric antibiotics
- Start empiric antimicrobial therapy promptly in patients with suspected CRBSI who are hemodynamically unstable, septic, or critically ill — do not withhold antibiotics pending culture results
- Assess the need for catheter removal based on the clinical scenario, causative organism, catheter type, and patient factors
- Narrow antimicrobial therapy once culture and susceptibility results are available (de-escalation)
- Determine duration of therapy based on the organism, whether the catheter is removed or retained, and the presence or absence of complications913
3.2 Empiric Antimicrobial Therapy
Recommendation: Empiric therapy for suspected CRBSI should cover the most likely pathogens based on the patient’s risk factors, catheter type, and local antibiogram.913
| Clinical Scenario | Empiric Regimen | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Standard empiric therapy (most ICU patients) | Vancomycin + an antipseudomonal beta-lactam (e.g., cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam, or meropenem) | Vancomycin provides MRSA and CoNS coverage; antipseudomonal beta-lactam covers gram-negative organisms including Pseudomonas |
| Suspected or known MRSA colonization | Vancomycin (or daptomycin if vancomycin-resistant or vancomycin-intolerant) + antipseudomonal beta-lactam | Ensure adequate MRSA coverage |
| Suspected fungal infection (TPN, prolonged antibiotics, neutropenia, Candida colonization) | Add echinocandin (micafungin, caspofungin, or anidulafungin) to the above regimen | Echinocandins are the preferred empiric antifungal agents for suspected Candida BSI; fluconazole is acceptable if patient is hemodynamically stable, not neutropenic, and not recently exposed to azoles |
| Femoral catheter | Vancomycin + antipseudomonal beta-lactam (ensure gram-negative coverage appropriate for inguinal flora) | Femoral catheters more commonly colonized with enteric gram-negative organisms |
| Known CRE or MDRO colonization | Tailor empiric coverage to include agents active against the colonizing organism (e.g., meropenem-vaborbactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, cefiderocol) | Ensure the empiric regimen provides activity against known resistant organisms |
| Neutropenic patient | Vancomycin + antipseudomonal beta-lactam ± echinocandin | Broad coverage essential due to immunosuppression; add antifungal if neutropenia >7 days |
Vancomycin Dosing:
- Loading dose: 25–30 mg/kg actual body weight IV
- Maintenance: target AUC/MIC 400–600 (guided by Bayesian vancomycin monitoring software when available); traditional trough-based monitoring targets of 15–20 mcg/mL have been superseded by AUC-guided dosing14
Daptomycin (6–10 mg/kg IV once daily) is an alternative to vancomycin for gram-positive coverage, particularly in patients with vancomycin-resistant organisms, documented vancomycin allergy, or persistent MRSA bacteremia not responding to vancomycin.913
3.3 Catheter Removal vs. Salvage
The decision to remove or attempt to salvage the catheter depends on the causative organism, catheter type, clinical severity, and availability of alternative vascular access.913
3.3.1 Indications for Catheter Removal
| Indication | Rationale |
|---|---|
| Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia | High risk of metastatic complications (endocarditis, osteomyelitis, septic emboli); catheter retention associated with increased relapse and mortality |
| Candida fungemia | Biofilm-associated Candida on the catheter surface is difficult to eradicate; catheter removal is mandatory for all Candida CRBSI |
| Tunnel infection or port-pocket infection | Localized purulence involving the subcutaneous tract or port pocket requires device removal |
| Septic shock or hemodynamic instability | Urgent source control warrants catheter removal |
| Persistent bacteremia/fungemia (>72 hours of appropriate antibiotics) | Failure to clear the bloodstream despite adequate antimicrobial therapy strongly suggests the catheter as the ongoing source |
| Septic thrombophlebitis | Infected thrombus associated with the catheter; removal is essential along with prolonged antibiotic therapy and possible anticoagulation |
| Endocarditis diagnosed in the setting of CRBSI | Catheter removal is part of source control |
| Metastatic complications (osteomyelitis, epidural abscess, septic arthritis, septic pulmonary emboli) | Catheter removal is required |
| Non-tunneled short-term catheter (in general) | Lower threshold for removal due to ease of replacement and lower value of individual device |
3.3.2 Catheter Salvage
Catheter salvage (retaining the catheter and treating with systemic antibiotics ± antibiotic lock therapy) may be considered in limited circumstances:913
| Scenario Favoring Salvage | Conditions for Salvage |
|---|---|
| Coagulase-negative staphylococci CRBSI | Patient clinically stable; no tunnel/port infection; no metastatic complications; willing to accept relapse risk |
| Limited vascular access (no alternative sites) | Particularly for tunneled catheters and implanted ports in oncology/hemodialysis patients |
| Long-term catheter (Enterococcus spp. in select cases) | Patient stable; catheter functionally necessary; plan for antibiotic lock therapy |
Salvage protocol:
- Systemic antibiotics targeted to the organism (see duration tables below)
- Antibiotic lock therapy instilled into the catheter lumen (dwell 8–24 hours per day) for the duration of systemic therapy
- Repeat blood cultures at 48–72 hours to confirm clearance
- If cultures remain positive at 72 hours, remove the catheter
- Monitor for relapse after completion of therapy
3.3.3 Antibiotic Lock Therapy for Catheter Salvage
| Organism | Lock Solution | Concentration | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coagulase-negative staphylococci | Vancomycin lock | 2–5 mg/mL (in normal saline with or without heparin) | Most common salvage scenario |
| MRSA (if salvage attempted — rare) | Vancomycin lock or daptomycin lock | Vancomycin 2–5 mg/mL; daptomycin 5 mg/mL | Salvage rarely appropriate for S. aureus; consult ID |
| Enterococcus spp. | Vancomycin lock (VSE) or daptomycin lock (VRE) | Vancomycin 2–5 mg/mL; daptomycin 5 mg/mL | |
| Gram-negative bacilli | Gentamicin or amikacin lock ± ceftazidime lock | Gentamicin 1–2 mg/mL; ceftazidime 0.5 mg/mL | Tailor to susceptibility |
| Candida spp. | Catheter removal required — no role for antifungal lock salvage in acute CRBSI | N/A | Catheter must be removed |
Lock technique:
- Fill the catheter lumen with the antibiotic lock solution (typical volume 2–5 mL depending on catheter lumen volume)
- Allow the solution to dwell for 8–24 hours (usually overnight or between uses)
- Aspirate and discard the lock solution before each catheter use
- Reinstill fresh lock solution after each use
- Continue for the duration of systemic antibiotic therapy (typically 7–14 days)915
3.4 Duration of Antimicrobial Therapy by Organism
Duration depends on the organism, whether the catheter is removed, and whether complications are present.913
| Organism | Catheter Removed, Uncomplicated | Catheter Retained (Salvage) | Complicated (Endocarditis, Osteomyelitis, Septic Thrombophlebitis) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coagulase-negative staphylococci | 5–7 days | 10–14 days (systemic + lock therapy) | 4–6 weeks (endocarditis) |
| Staphylococcus aureus | Minimum 14 days (from first negative blood culture after catheter removal); 4–6 weeks if complicated; TEE recommended to exclude endocarditis | Salvage not recommended | 4–6 weeks (endocarditis), 6–8 weeks (osteomyelitis) |
| Enterococcus spp. | 7–14 days | 10–14 days (systemic + lock therapy) | 4–6 weeks (endocarditis) |
| Gram-negative bacilli (Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas) | 7–14 days | 10–14 days (systemic + lock therapy) | 4–6 weeks (endocarditis), 6–8 weeks (osteomyelitis) |
| Candida spp. | 14 days minimum from first negative blood culture after catheter removal; ophthalmologic evaluation for endophthalmitis | Salvage not appropriate; catheter must be removed | 4–6 weeks for endocarditis; longer for endophthalmitis or deep-seated candidiasis |
3.5 Special Considerations by Organism
3.5.1 Staphylococcus aureus CRBSI
S. aureus bacteremia from any source — including CRBSI — warrants particularly rigorous management due to the high rate of metastatic complications (endocarditis, osteomyelitis, septic emboli).1316
Mandatory workup and management steps:
- Remove the catheter — salvage is not recommended for S. aureus CRBSI
- Obtain repeat blood cultures every 24–48 hours until clearance is documented
- Obtain transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to evaluate for endocarditis — transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) has insufficient sensitivity to exclude vegetations; TEE is recommended for all cases of S. aureus bacteremia unless comorbidities preclude the procedure
- Minimum 14 days of IV antibiotics from the first negative blood culture date if TEE is negative, there is no prosthetic material, and bacteremia clears within 72 hours of catheter removal
- 4–6 weeks of IV antibiotics if TEE shows vegetations, if prosthetic material is present, or if bacteremia persists >72 hours after catheter removal
- Infectious disease consultation is recommended for all cases of S. aureus bacteremia — studies demonstrate reduced mortality and relapse rates with ID consultation16
3.5.2 Candida CRBSI
- Remove the catheter — this is mandatory for all Candida bloodstream infections associated with a central line
- Empiric antifungal therapy: Echinocandin (micafungin 100 mg IV daily, caspofungin 70 mg IV load then 50 mg daily, or anidulafungin 200 mg IV load then 100 mg daily) is the preferred first-line agent. Fluconazole 800 mg load then 400 mg daily is acceptable if the patient is hemodynamically stable, not neutropenic, and has no recent azole exposure
- Duration: 14 days from the first negative blood culture after catheter removal
- Ophthalmologic evaluation for Candida endophthalmitis in all patients with candidemia (within 1 week of diagnosis in non-neutropenic patients; after neutrophil recovery in neutropenic patients)
- Speciate the Candida isolate and obtain antifungal susceptibility testing; adjust therapy based on species and susceptibility (C. glabrata and C. krusei may be fluconazole-resistant; C. auris may be multidrug-resistant)1317
3.5.3 Persistent Bacteremia / Fungemia
If blood cultures remain positive after 72 hours of appropriate antimicrobial therapy and catheter removal, evaluate for:
- Metastatic infection: Endocarditis (TEE), osteomyelitis (MRI), septic thrombophlebitis (CT with contrast or duplex ultrasound), epidural abscess, septic arthritis, septic pulmonary emboli
- Retained infected foreign body (e.g., another intravascular device, prosthetic valve, prosthetic joint)
- Antimicrobial resistance — review susceptibility data; consider broadening therapy
- Inadequate source control — consider repeat imaging for undrained collections
3.6 Suppurative Thrombophlebitis
Suppurative (septic) thrombophlebitis involves infection of a thrombus within the catheterized vein, creating a continuous source of bacteremia or fungemia. It should be suspected when:913
- Bloodstream infection persists despite catheter removal and appropriate antimicrobial therapy
- There is clinical evidence of venous thrombosis (edema, erythema along the vessel course, palpable cord)
- Imaging (CT with contrast, Doppler ultrasound) demonstrates thrombus in the catheterized vein
Management of Suppurative Thrombophlebitis:
| Component | Details |
|---|---|
| Catheter removal | Mandatory |
| Systemic antibiotics | 4–6 weeks IV (organism-directed, based on culture and susceptibility) |
| Anticoagulation | Therapeutic anticoagulation is generally recommended (heparin then transition to warfarin or DOAC) for the duration of thrombus treatment; duration 3–6 months depending on extent and resolution |
| Surgical excision | Rarely required; considered for peripheral vein suppurative thrombophlebitis refractory to medical therapy |
| Repeat imaging | To assess thrombus resolution |
4. Guidewire Exchange
Recommendation: Guidewire exchange of a central venous catheter should not be performed routinely to prevent infection. However, guidewire exchange may be appropriate in the following circumstances:3
- Catheter malfunction (occlusion, malposition) in a patient without evidence of infection at the existing insertion site
- Need for a different catheter type (e.g., exchange to a larger-bore or multilumen catheter) when the existing site is preferred
Contraindications to guidewire exchange:
- Documented or suspected catheter-related infection at the existing site
- Purulence or cellulitis at the insertion site
- Known bacteremia/fungemia
If guidewire exchange is performed:
- Full maximal sterile barrier precautions must be used (as for new insertion)
- The removed catheter tip should be sent for semi-quantitative culture
- If the catheter tip culture subsequently returns ≥15 CFU, the newly placed catheter should be removed and a new catheter inserted at a different site3
Buetti N, Marschall J, Drees M, et al. “Strategies to Prevent Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections in Acute-Care Hospitals: 2022 Update.” Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022;43(5):553-569. DOI: 10.1017/ice.2022.87 ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎
Marschall J, Mermel LA, Fakih M, et al. “Strategies to Prevent Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections in Acute Care Hospitals: 2014 Update.” Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014;35(7):753-771. DOI: 10.1086/676533 ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎
O’Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA, et al. “Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter-Related Infections, 2011.” Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(9):e162-e193. DOI: 10.1093/cid/cir257 ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎
Lai NM, Chaiyakunapruk N, Lai NA, O’Riordan E, Pau WS, Saint S. “Catheter Impregnation, Coating or Bonding for Reducing Central Venous Catheter-Related Infections in Adults.” Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;(3):CD007878. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007878.pub3 ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎
Darouiche RO, Raad II, Heard SO, et al. “A Comparison of Two Antimicrobial-Impregnated Central Venous Catheters.” N Engl J Med. 1999;340(1):1-8. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199901073400101 ↩︎ ↩︎
Zacharioudakis IM, Zervou FN, Arvanitis M, Ziakas PD, Mermel LA, Mylonakis E. “Antimicrobial Lock Solutions as a Method to Prevent Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.” Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59(12):1741-1749. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciu671 ↩︎
Timsit JF, Schwebel C, Bouadma L, et al. “Chlorhexidine-Impregnated Sponges and Less Frequent Dressing Changes for Prevention of Catheter-Related Infections in Critically Ill Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial.” JAMA. 2009;301(12):1231-1241. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2009.376 ↩︎
Timsit JF, Mimoz O, Mourvillier B, et al. “Randomized Controlled Trial of Chlorhexidine Dressing and Highly Adhesive Dressing for Preventing Catheter-Related Infections in Critically Ill Adults.” Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;186(12):1272-1278. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201206-1038OC ↩︎
Mermel LA, Allon M, Bouza E, et al. “Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Intravascular Catheter-Related Infection: 2009 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.” Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49(1):1-45. DOI: 10.1086/599376 ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎
Safdar N, Fine JP, Maki DG. “Meta-Analysis: Methods for Diagnosing Intravascular Device-Related Bloodstream Infection.” Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(6):451-466. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-142-6-200503150-00011 ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎
Blot F, Nitenberg G, Chachaty E, et al. “Diagnosis of Catheter-Related Bacteraemia: A Prospective Comparison of the Time to Positivity of Hub-Blood versus Peripheral-Blood Cultures.” Lancet. 1999;354(9184):1071-1077. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)11134-0 ↩︎
Maki DG, Weise CE, Sarafin HW. “A Semiquantitative Culture Method for Identifying Intravenous-Catheter-Related Infection.” N Engl J Med. 1977;296(23):1305-1309. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM197706092962301 ↩︎ ↩︎
Mermel LA, Allon M, Bouza E, et al. “Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Intravascular Catheter-Related Infection: 2009 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.” Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49(1):1-45. DOI: 10.1086/599376 ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎
Rybak MJ, Le J, Lodise TP, et al. “Therapeutic Monitoring of Vancomycin for Serious Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections: A Revised Consensus Guideline and Review by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists.” Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2020;77(11):835-864. DOI: 10.1093/ajhp/zxaa036 ↩︎
Justo JA, Bookstaver PB. “Antibiotic Lock Therapy: Review of Technique and Logistical Challenges.” Infect Drug Resist. 2014;7:343-363. DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S51388 ↩︎
Holland TL, Arnold C, Fowler VG Jr. “Clinical Management of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: A Review.” JAMA. 2014;312(13):1330-1341. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.9743 ↩︎ ↩︎
Pappas PG, Kauffman CA, Andes DR, et al. “Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Candidiasis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.” Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62(4):e1-e50. DOI: 10.1093/cid/civ933 ↩︎