Acute Kidney Injury — Part 3: Conservative Management of AKI Complications

Fluid management, hyperkalemia emergency algorithm, electrolyte and acid-base management, diuretic therapy including furosemide stress test, drug dosing in AKI, and nutritional considerations.

guidelinesMar 2026guidelines

1. Fluid Management in AKI

1.1 Assessment of Volume Status

Accurate assessment of volume status is fundamental to AKI management. Both hypovolemia and hypervolemia are harmful to the injured kidney. The challenge in critically ill patients is that traditional clinical signs (JVP, peripheral edema, lung crackles) have poor sensitivity and specificity for intravascular volume status.1 2

Integrated Volume Assessment

Assessment ToolWhat It MeasuresUtilityLimitations
Clinical examinationSkin turgor, mucous membranes, JVP, peripheral edema, lung auscultationInitial global assessment; identifies severe depletion or overloadPoor sensitivity/specificity in critically ill patients; edema may reflect capillary leak, not hypervolemia
Fluid balance calculationCumulative intake minus outputTracks fluid accumulation over time; identifies progressive fluid overloadDoes not account for insensible losses; does not reflect intravascular status
Body weightTotal body water changesDaily weight trending is useful for detecting fluid accumulationUnreliable in ICU (bed scales, dressings, drains); does not reflect compartmental distribution
IVC ultrasoundIVC diameter and collapsibility/distensibilityIdentifies extreme hypovolemia (small, collapsible IVC) and severe congestion (dilated, non-collapsible IVC)Intermediate values (1.5-2.5 cm) are non-diagnostic; unreliable with positive pressure ventilation at high PEEP; operator-dependent
Lung ultrasound (B-lines)Extravascular lung water≥ 3 B-lines per zone indicates pulmonary edema; can detect subclinical congestion before CXR changesDoes not distinguish cardiogenic from non-cardiogenic edema
Central venous pressure (CVP)Right atrial pressureExtreme values informative (< 3 suggests hypovolemia; > 15 suggests congestion); elevated CVP associated with AKIPoor predictor of fluid responsiveness at intermediate values; does not predict preload augmentation
Dynamic preload assessmentFluid responsiveness (will cardiac output increase with a fluid bolus?)Passive leg raise, pulse pressure variation (PPV > 13%), stroke volume variation (SVV > 12%) — validated in mechanically ventilated patients in sinus rhythmPPV/SVV require controlled ventilation, sinus rhythm, Vt ≥ 8 mL/kg; PLR requires real-time CO monitoring

1.2 Fluid Responsiveness vs. Fluid Tolerance

A paradigm shift in ICU fluid management recognizes that being “fluid responsive” does not necessarily mean that fluids should be given. The decision to administer fluids requires answering two questions:2

  1. Is the patient fluid responsive? (Will a fluid bolus increase cardiac output?)
  2. Is the patient fluid tolerant? (Can the patient accommodate the additional volume without harm — i.e., without worsening pulmonary edema, intra-abdominal pressure, or venous congestion?)

Key Concept: In AKI patients with fluid overload, the goal shifts from resuscitation to de-resuscitation — active fluid removal through diuretics or ultrafiltration to relieve venous congestion and reduce interstitial edema.

1.3 Fluid Overload Recognition and Significance

Fluid overload is defined as a cumulative positive fluid balance exceeding 10% of baseline body weight and is independently associated with adverse outcomes in AKI:3 4

  • Mortality: Fluid overload is associated with a 2-3-fold increase in mortality in AKI patients, independent of AKI severity
  • AKI progression: Fluid overload worsens AKI through renal venous congestion, increased renal interstitial pressure, and renal compartment syndrome
  • Respiratory failure: Pulmonary edema impairs gas exchange and may necessitate or prolong mechanical ventilation
  • Impaired wound healing, bowel edema, intra-abdominal hypertension

Fluid overload severity grading:

GradeCumulative Fluid Balance (% of body weight)Clinical Significance
Mild5-10%Peripheral edema; monitor closely
Moderate10-15%Pulmonary congestion likely; consider diuretic therapy; independently associated with increased mortality
Severe> 15%Significant organ edema; diuretic therapy or RRT for fluid removal likely needed

2. Electrolyte Management

2.1 Hyperkalemia — Emergency Management

Hyperkalemia is the most immediately life-threatening electrolyte derangement in AKI. Serum potassium > 6.0 mEq/L or any level with ECG changes constitutes a medical emergency requiring immediate treatment.1 5

ECG Changes of Hyperkalemia (Progressive)

Potassium Level (approximate)ECG Findings
5.5-6.5 mEq/LPeaked (tall, narrow) T waves, shortened QT interval
6.5-7.5 mEq/LProlonged PR interval, widened QRS complex, flattened P waves
7.5-8.0 mEq/LLoss of P waves, further QRS widening, “sine wave” pattern
> 8.0 mEq/LSine wave pattern → ventricular fibrillation → asystole

Critical Warning: ECG changes do not reliably correlate with specific potassium levels in individual patients. Any patient with potassium > 6.0 mEq/L should be placed on continuous cardiac monitoring and have an ECG performed immediately. The absence of ECG changes does not exclude lethal hyperkalemia.

Hyperkalemia Emergency Treatment Algorithm

Step 1: Cardiac Membrane Stabilization (immediate — within 1-3 minutes)

AgentDoseRouteOnsetDurationMechanism
Calcium gluconate 10%30 mL (3 ampules) IV over 5-10 minutesIV1-3 minutes30-60 minutesStabilizes myocardial cell membrane; does NOT lower potassium; repeat if ECG changes persist
Calcium chloride 10%10 mL (1 ampule) IV over 5-10 minutesIV (central line preferred)1-3 minutes30-60 minutes3x more elemental calcium per mL than gluconate; caustic — risk of tissue necrosis if extravasation; prefer gluconate via peripheral IV

Note: Calcium should be given first, before any potassium-lowering therapy, if ECG changes are present. It is a temporizing measure only.

Step 2: Intracellular Potassium Shift (onset 15-30 minutes)

AgentDoseRouteOnsetDurationExpected K+ ReductionKey Considerations
Regular insulin + dextroseInsulin 10 units IV bolus + dextrose 50% 50 mL (25 g) IVIV15-30 minutes4-6 hours0.5-1.2 mEq/LMost reliable potassium-lowering agent; monitor glucose q1h for 4-6 hours; hypoglycemia occurs in 10-75% of patients; give additional D50 if glucose < 250 mg/dL at time of insulin administration; consider 5 units insulin if baseline glucose < 200 mg/dL
Inhaled albuterol (nebulized)10-20 mg nebulized over 10-15 minutesInhaled15-30 minutes2-4 hours0.5-1.0 mEq/LHigh dose required (4-8x standard bronchodilator dose); additive effect when combined with insulin/dextrose; may cause tachycardia; 20-40% of patients are non-responders
Sodium bicarbonate50-100 mEq IV over 30-60 minutesIV30-60 minutes2-4 hours0.3-0.5 mEq/LPrimarily useful if concurrent metabolic acidosis (pH < 7.20); limited efficacy as sole potassium-lowering agent in non-acidotic patients; may cause volume overload and hypernatremia

Step 3: Potassium Removal from the Body

AgentDoseRouteOnsetMechanismKey Considerations
Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC, Lokelma)10 g PO/NG q8h x 3 doses (acute), then 5-10 g daily (maintenance)Oral / NG tube1-2 hoursNon-absorbed potassium binder; exchanges potassium for sodium/hydrogen in GI tractFaster onset and more predictable than sodium polystyrene sulfonate; well tolerated; may cause edema (sodium load); preferred over SPS for GI potassium removal
Patiromer (Veltassa)8.4 g PO daily (can increase to 25.2 g daily)Oral4-7 hoursNon-absorbed potassium binder; exchanges potassium for calcium in GI tractSlower onset; more suitable for chronic/subacute hyperkalemia; separate from other oral medications by ≥ 3 hours; do NOT use for emergency management
Sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS, Kayexalate)15-60 g PO or 30-60 g rectalOral or rectal2-6 hours (oral), 1-2 hours (rectal)Exchanges potassium for sodium in GI tractFalling out of favor due to unpredictable efficacy, risk of intestinal necrosis (particularly with sorbitol in post-operative patients), and sodium loading; avoid in post-operative patients and those with ileus
Loop diuretics (furosemide)40-80 mg IV (or 1-1.5 mg/kg)IV15-30 minutes (onset of diuresis)Increased renal potassium excretionOnly effective if residual kidney function present; combine with normal saline to maintain euvolemia if needed
Renal replacement therapyCRRT or urgent IHDExtracorporealImmediate (once started)Direct removal of potassium from bloodDefinitive treatment for severe, refractory hyperkalemia; initiate without delay for life-threatening hyperkalemia unresponsive to medical therapy

2.2 Metabolic Acidosis

AKI results in metabolic acidosis through two primary mechanisms: (1) reduced renal excretion of hydrogen ions and (2) reduced renal regeneration of bicarbonate. Additionally, accumulation of uremic organic acids contributes to the anion gap.1 6

Assessment:

ParameterMeasurementInterpretation
Arterial pHABG< 7.35 = acidemia
Serum bicarbonateBMP/CMP< 22 mEq/L = metabolic acidosis
Anion gapNa - (Cl + HCO3)Normal 8-12 mEq/L; elevated AG with AKI suggests uremic acidosis or concurrent cause (lactic acidosis, ketoacidosis)
Delta-delta(Change in AG) / (Change in HCO3)Helps identify mixed disorders

Management:

  • Mild acidosis (pH 7.20-7.35): Generally well tolerated; optimize renal function; correct underlying cause
  • Moderate acidosis (pH 7.10-7.20): Consider sodium bicarbonate infusion (150 mEq NaHCO3 in 1 L D5W at 100-200 mL/hr) if hemodynamic compromise; target pH > 7.20
  • Severe acidosis (pH < 7.10): May require RRT, especially if concurrent fluid overload or refractory hyperkalemia; sodium bicarbonate bolus (50-100 mEq) as temporizing measure
  • The BICAR-ICU trial demonstrated that in AKI patients with severe metabolic acidosis (pH ≤ 7.20, bicarbonate ≤ 20 mmol/L, PaCO2 ≤ 45 mmHg), sodium bicarbonate targeting pH > 7.30 reduced the composite of death or at least one organ failure at day 7 compared to no bicarbonate (66% vs. 71%, p = 0.09 overall; significant benefit in the AKI subgroup with reduced 28-day mortality and reduced RRT requirement)7

2.3 Hyponatremia

Hyponatremia in AKI is most commonly dilutional (hypervolemic hyponatremia) due to impaired free water excretion.1

TypeMechanism in AKIManagement
Hypervolemic hyponatremiaReduced free water excretion; ongoing hypotonic fluid administrationFluid restriction (< 1 L/day); loop diuretics with hypertonic saline replacement if severe; RRT provides excellent sodium correction
Euvolemic hyponatremiaSIADH (common in critically ill); drugs (narcotics, SSRIs)Fluid restriction; treat underlying cause; cautious hypertonic saline (3%) if Na < 120 or symptomatic
Hypovolemic hyponatremiaVolume depletion with disproportionate sodium lossIsotonic crystalloid resuscitation

Correction rate: Do not exceed 8-10 mEq/L correction in any 24-hour period to avoid osmotic demyelination syndrome. In patients on CRRT, monitor sodium closely as CRRT can cause rapid correction — adjust dialysate/replacement fluid sodium concentration if needed.

2.4 Hyperphosphatemia

Hyperphosphatemia results from decreased renal phosphate excretion in AKI and is particularly severe in tumor lysis syndrome and rhabdomyolysis.1

  • Target: Serum phosphorus < 5.5 mg/dL
  • Treatment: Phosphate binders with meals (sevelamer 800-1600 mg TID, calcium acetate 1334 mg TID — avoid calcium-based binders if concurrent hypercalcemia); dietary phosphate restriction; RRT effectively removes phosphorus

2.5 Hypocalcemia

Hypocalcemia may occur in AKI due to hyperphosphatemia (calcium-phosphate precipitation), reduced 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D production, and resistance to parathyroid hormone. Citrate anticoagulation during CRRT is an additional cause (see Part 4).1

  • Treat only if symptomatic (tetany, seizures, prolonged QT) or ionized calcium < 0.9 mmol/L
  • Calcium gluconate 1-2 g IV over 10-20 minutes for symptomatic hypocalcemia
  • Avoid aggressive calcium replacement if phosphorus is markedly elevated (risk of metastatic calcification)

3. Diuretic Therapy in AKI

3.1 Role of Diuretics

Diuretics — primarily loop diuretics (furosemide, bumetanide, torsemide) — are used in AKI to manage fluid overload, not to treat or prevent the underlying kidney injury. There is no evidence that diuretics improve outcomes, hasten renal recovery, or reduce the need for RRT. However, they are an essential tool for fluid management when residual kidney function is present.1 8

Important distinctions:

  • Diuretics do NOT improve AKI outcomes: Multiple studies and meta-analyses have shown that diuretics do not reduce mortality, need for RRT, or hasten renal recovery8
  • Diuretics can manage complications of AKI: Effective fluid removal in patients with pulmonary edema, fluid overload, and volume-dependent hypertension
  • Converting oliguric to non-oliguric AKI: While diuretics may increase urine output, this does not reflect improved kidney function — it merely makes fluid management easier

3.2 Loop Diuretic Dosing

AgentIV Bolus DoseContinuous InfusionRelative PotencyNotes
Furosemide40-80 mg (AKI-naive); 80-200 mg (AKI with prior diuretic exposure or CKD)10-40 mg/hr (after loading dose)1x (reference)Most widely used; ceiling dose 200-400 mg per bolus
Bumetanide1-2 mg0.5-2 mg/hr40x furosemideMore predictable oral bioavailability; less ototoxicity at high doses
Torsemide20-50 mgNot commonly used as infusion4x furosemideLongest half-life; less available as IV formulation
Ethacrynic acid50-100 mgNot commonly used0.7x furosemideAlternative if severe sulfonamide allergy (only non-sulfonamide loop diuretic)

Continuous infusion vs. intermittent bolus: The DOSE trial demonstrated no significant difference in outcomes between continuous infusion and intermittent bolus furosemide, but continuous infusion may provide more steady diuresis and be preferred in patients requiring large total daily doses.9

Combination diuretic therapy (“sequential nephron blockade”):

  • Adding a thiazide diuretic (metolazone 2.5-10 mg PO or chlorothiazide 500 mg IV) 30 minutes before loop diuretic administration can synergistically enhance diuresis in diuretic-resistant patients
  • Mechanism: Thiazides block sodium reabsorption in the distal convoluted tubule, preventing compensatory sodium reabsorption that limits loop diuretic efficacy
  • Monitor closely for hypokalemia, hyponatremia, and excessive volume depletion

3.3 Furosemide Stress Test (FST)

The furosemide stress test is a standardized functional assessment of tubular integrity that predicts progression to severe AKI (Stage 3) and need for RRT. It is both a diagnostic and prognostic tool.10

Protocol

ParameterDetails
Patient populationAKI Stage 1 or 2 (early AKI); euvolemic or hypervolemic (NOT hypovolemic)
Dose1.0 mg/kg IV furosemide if diuretic-naive; 1.5 mg/kg IV furosemide if prior loop diuretic exposure within 7 days
MonitoringUrine output measured hourly for 2 hours after administration
Positive response (good prognosis)Urine output > 200 mL in the first 2 hours (> 100 mL/hr average)
Negative response (poor prognosis)Urine output ≤ 200 mL in the first 2 hours
Fluid replacementReplace urine output mL-for-mL with isotonic crystalloid during the test to maintain euvolemia

Prognostic Performance

FST ResultProgression to Stage 3 AKINeed for RRTAUC
Positive response (UOP > 200 mL/2hr)~10-15%~5-10%0.87 for RRT prediction
Negative response (UOP ≤ 200 mL/2hr)~60-80%~40-60%

Clinical Application: The FST can be used to (1) identify patients who may benefit from early nephrology consultation and RRT planning, (2) guide disposition decisions (patients with a positive FST may not need ICU-level monitoring for AKI), and (3) enrich future clinical trial populations for AKI intervention studies. The FST has an AUC of 0.87 for predicting subsequent need for RRT, which is superior to both clinical judgment and serum biomarkers at the time of early AKI.10


4. Drug Dosing Adjustments in AKI

4.1 General Principles

Drug dosing in AKI requires consideration of several factors:11

  • Volume of distribution (Vd): AKI patients often have expanded Vd due to fluid overload, edema, and capillary leak → loading doses should generally NOT be reduced
  • Clearance: Renal drug clearance is reduced in proportion to GFR decline; non-renal clearance may also be affected (hepatic and GI dysfunction are common in critically ill patients with AKI)
  • Protein binding: Uremia reduces protein binding of acidic drugs (phenytoin, warfarin) → increased free drug fraction → potential toxicity at “normal” total drug levels
  • Active metabolites: Some drugs have renally excreted active metabolites that accumulate in AKI (e.g., morphine-6-glucuronide, normeperidine)
  • RRT effects: CRRT and IHD remove drugs to varying degrees depending on molecular weight, protein binding, and volume of distribution (see Part 4)

4.2 Antimicrobial Dosing in AKI — Expanded Reference

DrugLoading DoseAKI Non-DialysisCRRTIHDTDM Required?
Vancomycin25-30 mg/kg IV x1Renal dose: 15 mg/kg then redose when trough < 1515-20 mg/kg load, then 500-1000 mg q24-48h; target AUC 400-60015-20 mg/kg after each sessionYes — AUC-guided
Piperacillin-tazobactamNo loading dose neededCrCl < 20: 2.25 g q6h4.5 g q8h (or 2.25 g q6h)2.25 g q8h + 0.75 g after HDNo
Meropenem1 g IV x1CrCl 10-25: 500 mg q12h; CrCl < 10: 500 mg q24h1 g q8-12h (dose depends on effluent rate)500 mg q24h + 500 mg after HDNo
Cefepime2 g IV x1CrCl < 10: 1 g q24h2 g q12h1 g q24h + 1 g after HDConsider (neurotoxicity risk)
CeftriaxoneNo loading doseNo adjustment neededNo adjustment neededNo adjustment neededNo
Amikacin15-20 mg/kg IV x1Extend interval to q48h+; dose by levelsRe-dose by levels (typically q24-48h)7.5 mg/kg after each HDYes
Gentamicin/Tobramycin5-7 mg/kg IV x1Extend interval; redose by levelsRe-dose by levels2 mg/kg after each HDYes
Fluconazole800 mg IV x1 (for invasive candidiasis)50% dose reduction if CrCl < 50Full dose (400-800 mg daily) — well clearedFull dose after each HD sessionNo
MicafunginNo loading doseNo adjustment neededNo adjustment neededNo adjustment neededNo
Acyclovir10 mg/kg IVCrCl 10-25: 10 mg/kg q12h; CrCl < 10: 5 mg/kg q24h5-10 mg/kg q24h5 mg/kg after each HDNo (ensure hydration)
LinezolidNo loading doseNo adjustment neededNo adjustment neededGiven after HD (30% removed)No
Daptomycin6-10 mg/kg IV x1CrCl < 30: q48h dosingq48h dosingq48h, dose after HDCPK monitoring
Metronidazole500 mg IV x1No adjustment typically neededNo adjustmentGiven before HDNo
Colistin (colistimethate)9 MIU IV x1 (loading)CrCl < 30: 4.5 MIU q12h4.5-6.75 MIU q12h (significant CRRT clearance)3 MIU after each HD + 4.5 MIU q12hConsider (nephro/neurotoxicity)

4.3 Sedation and Analgesia in AKI

DrugConsiderations in AKI
PropofolNo adjustment needed; hepatic clearance
MidazolamActive metabolite (alpha-hydroxymidazolam) accumulates in AKI → prolonged sedation; avoid prolonged infusions; prefer propofol or dexmedetomidine
DexmedetomidineNo dose adjustment needed; hepatic clearance; safe in AKI
FentanylPreferred opioid in AKI; primarily hepatic metabolism; no significant active metabolite accumulation; reduce dose if hepatic impairment
MorphineAvoid in AKI; active metabolite (morphine-6-glucuronide) accumulates → prolonged sedation and respiratory depression
HydromorphoneAcceptable in AKI (less active metabolite accumulation than morphine); reduce dose by 50-75%
RemifentanilIdeal in AKI; ester hydrolysis by non-specific esterases; no renal clearance; ultra-short acting
KetamineNo dose adjustment needed; hepatic metabolism
CisatracuriumPreferred neuromuscular blocker in AKI; Hoffman elimination (organ-independent)
Rocuronium/VecuroniumDuration prolonged in AKI (partially renally cleared active metabolites); use cisatracurium instead when possible

4.4 Anticoagulation in AKI

DrugConsiderations in AKI
Unfractionated heparin (UFH)No dose adjustment needed for renal function; dose adjusted by aPTT or anti-Xa level; preferred in AKI due to short half-life, reversibility, and non-renal clearance
Enoxaparin (therapeutic)CrCl < 30: 1 mg/kg q24h (not q12h); monitor anti-Xa levels; consider UFH instead
Enoxaparin (prophylactic)CrCl < 30: 30 mg daily (not 40 mg); monitor anti-Xa in extremes of weight
FondaparinuxContraindicated if CrCl < 30; renally cleared; long half-life
ArgatrobanNo dose adjustment for AKI (hepatic clearance); preferred in HIT with AKI
BivalirudinReduce dose by 20-30% if CrCl < 30; partially renally cleared
WarfarinNo specific dose adjustment, but increased sensitivity due to reduced protein binding; INR monitoring essential
DOACs (apixaban, rivarelbanum, dabigatran, edoxaban)Generally avoid in AKI with CrCl < 25-30; dabigatran is the most renally cleared (80%) and should be avoided first; apixaban has the least renal clearance (27%) and may be continued at reduced dose (2.5 mg BID) in moderate AKI

5. Nutritional Considerations in AKI

5.1 Energy Requirements

Critically ill patients with AKI have increased energy expenditure due to the catabolic state of critical illness, compounded by the additional metabolic burden of AKI (uremia, acidosis, inflammation).1 12

ParameterRecommendation
Energy target20-30 kcal/kg/day (use indirect calorimetry if available; otherwise, 25 kcal/kg/day as starting point)
RouteEnteral nutrition is preferred; initiate early (within 24-48 hours of ICU admission) if GI tract is functional
Avoid overfeedingOverfeeding increases CO2 production, azotemia, and fluid requirements

5.2 Protein Requirements

Protein requirements vary significantly based on whether the patient is receiving RRT:1 12 13

Clinical ScenarioProtein Target (g/kg/day)Rationale
AKI, non-dialysis, non-catabolic0.8-1.0Avoid excessive protein loading that increases uremia; provide adequate protein to prevent catabolism
AKI, non-dialysis, catabolic1.0-1.5Critical illness induces hypercatabolism; inadequate protein worsens muscle wasting and immunodeficiency
AKI on CRRT1.5-2.0 (some guidelines recommend up to 2.5)CRRT removes 10-17 g of amino acids per day; protein losses must be replaced; nitrogen balance studies demonstrate significant amino acid losses in effluent
AKI on IHD1.2-1.5Intermittent amino acid losses during dialysis sessions

5.3 Micronutrient Considerations

NutrientConcern in AKIRecommendation
PhosphorusHyperphosphatemia in oliguric AKI; monitor closelyLow-phosphorus enteral formulas if hyperphosphatemia present; phosphate binders with feeds
PotassiumHyperkalemia riskLow-potassium enteral formulas if hyperkalemia present; monitor levels closely with nutrition initiation
Water-soluble vitaminsCleared by CRRT (thiamine, folate, vitamin C, B6)Supplement daily in patients on CRRT: thiamine 100 mg, folic acid 1 mg, vitamin C 100 mg, MVI daily
Trace elementsSelenium, zinc, and copper may be lost in CRRT effluentMonitor and supplement as needed; standard ICU trace element supplementation is generally adequate

6. Uremic Complications Requiring Urgent Intervention

6.1 Recognition of Uremia

Uremia represents the systemic toxicity caused by the accumulation of metabolic waste products normally excreted by the kidneys. Severe uremia is an absolute indication for RRT initiation.1

SystemUremic Manifestations
NeurologicUremic encephalopathy (confusion, lethargy, asterixis, myoclonus, seizures, coma); peripheral neuropathy
CardiovascularUremic pericarditis (hemorrhagic; contraindication to heparin — use citrate anticoagulation for RRT); accelerated atherosclerosis
HematologicUremic platelet dysfunction (prolonged bleeding time despite normal platelet count and coagulation studies); anemia (reduced erythropoietin)
GastrointestinalNausea, vomiting, anorexia, uremic fetor, GI bleeding (uremic gastritis/colitis)
ImmunologicImpaired cell-mediated immunity; increased infection risk
MetabolicHyperkalemia, metabolic acidosis, hyperphosphatemia, secondary hyperparathyroidism

Uremic Pericarditis — Special Warning: Uremic pericarditis is a hemorrhagic pericarditis that occurs in the setting of severe uremia (BUN typically > 100 mg/dL). It is an absolute indication for urgent RRT. Heparin must be avoided for RRT anticoagulation in these patients (risk of hemorrhagic tamponade); use regional citrate anticoagulation or no anticoagulation. If pericardial effusion with tamponade develops, emergent pericardiocentesis is required.


References


  1. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Acute Kidney Injury Work Group. “KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for Acute Kidney Injury.” Kidney Int Suppl. 2012;2(1):1-138. DOI: 10.1038/kisup.2012.1 ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎

  2. Malbrain MLNG, Marik PE, Witters I, et al. “Fluid Overload, De-Resuscitation, and Outcomes in Critically Ill or Injured Patients: A Systematic Review with Suggestions for Clinical Practice.” Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2014;46(5):361-380. DOI: 10.5603/AIT.2014.0060 ↩︎ ↩︎

  3. Bouchard J, Soroko SB, Chertow GM, et al. “Fluid Accumulation, Survival and Recovery of Kidney Function in Critically Ill Patients with Acute Kidney Injury.” Kidney Int. 2009;76(4):422-427. DOI: 10.1038/ki.2009.159 ↩︎

  4. Vaara ST, Korhonen AM, Kaukonen KM, et al. “Fluid Overload Is Associated with an Increased Risk for 90-Day Mortality in Critically Ill Patients with Renal Replacement Therapy: Data from the Prospective FINNAKI Study.” Crit Care. 2012;16(5):R197. DOI: 10.1186/cc11682 ↩︎

  5. Palmer BF, Clegg DJ. “Diagnosis and Treatment of Hyperkalemia.” Cleve Clin J Med. 2017;84(12):934-942. DOI: 10.3949/ccjm.84a.17056 ↩︎

  6. Kraut JA, Madias NE. “Metabolic Acidosis: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Management.” Nat Rev Nephrol. 2010;6(5):274-285. DOI: 10.1038/nrneph.2010.33 ↩︎

  7. Jaber S, Paugam C, Futier E, et al. “Sodium Bicarbonate Therapy for Patients with Severe Metabolic Acidaemia in the Intensive Care Unit (BICAR-ICU): A Multicentre, Open-Label, Randomised Controlled, Phase 3 Trial.” Lancet. 2018;392(10141):31-40. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31080-8 ↩︎

  8. Ho KM, Sheridan DJ. “Meta-Analysis of Frusemide to Prevent or Treat Acute Renal Failure.” BMJ. 2006;333(7565):420. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38902.605347.7C ↩︎ ↩︎

  9. Felker GM, Lee KL, Bull DA, et al. “Diuretic Strategies in Patients with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure (DOSE).” N Engl J Med. 2011;364(9):797-805. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1005419 ↩︎

  10. Chawla LS, Davison DL, Brasha-Mitchell E, et al. “Development and Standardization of a Furosemide Stress Test to Predict the Severity of Acute Kidney Injury.” Crit Care. 2013;17(5):R207. DOI: 10.1186/cc13015 ↩︎ ↩︎

  11. Matzke GR, Aronoff GR, Atkinson AJ Jr, et al. “Drug Dosing Consideration in Patients with Acute and Chronic Kidney Disease — A Clinical Update from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO).” Kidney Int. 2011;80(11):1122-1137. DOI: 10.1038/ki.2011.322 ↩︎

  12. Fiaccadori E, Sabatino A, Barazzoni R, et al. “ESPEN Guideline on Clinical Nutrition in Hospitalized Patients with Acute or Chronic Kidney Disease.” Clin Nutr. 2021;40(4):1644-1668. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.01.028 ↩︎ ↩︎

  13. Scheinkestel CD, Kar L, Marshall K, et al. “Prospective Randomized Trial to Assess Caloric and Protein Needs of Critically Ill, Anuric, Ventilated Patients Requiring Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy.” Nutrition. 2003;19(11-12):909-916. DOI: 10.1016/S0899-9007(03)00175-8 ↩︎