Acute Coronary Syndromes — Part 1: Definitions, Pathophysiology & Initial Evaluation
ACS spectrum definitions, Fourth Universal Definition of MI (Types 1-5), pathophysiology, initial ED evaluation, 12-lead ECG interpretation, STEMI criteria by territory, STEMI equivalents, and right ventricular MI.
1. The Acute Coronary Syndrome Spectrum
1.1 Overview
Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) encompass a spectrum of clinical presentations resulting from acute myocardial ischemia, unified by a common pathophysiology — disruption of a coronary atherosclerotic plaque with superimposed thrombosis, leading to reduction or cessation of myocardial blood flow. The ACS spectrum is classified into three categories based on ECG findings and biomarker status:1 2
| Category | ECG Finding | Troponin | Pathology |
|---|---|---|---|
| STEMI | Persistent ST-segment elevation (or new LBBB/STEMI equivalents) | Elevated (rise and/or fall) | Complete or near-complete coronary occlusion with transmural ischemia |
| NSTEMI | ST depression, T-wave inversions, non-specific changes, or normal | Elevated (rise and/or fall with at least one value above the 99th percentile URL) | Partial coronary occlusion or complete occlusion with collaterals; subendocardial ischemia/necrosis |
| Unstable Angina (UA) | ST depression, T-wave inversions, non-specific changes, or normal | Normal (below 99th percentile URL) | Partial coronary occlusion without myocardial necrosis |
1.2 Key Distinctions
- STEMI requires emergent reperfusion therapy (primary PCI or fibrinolysis) and is a time-critical diagnosis. The ECG is the primary diagnostic tool.1
- NSTEMI is distinguished from UA solely by the presence of elevated cardiac troponin, indicating myocardial necrosis. Both require urgent risk stratification and consideration of invasive management.2
- Unstable Angina has become less commonly diagnosed in the era of high-sensitivity troponin assays, as many patients previously classified as UA are now reclassified as NSTEMI due to detection of smaller degrees of myocardial necrosis.3
- The distinction between STEMI and NSTEMI/UA is made at the time of initial ECG and determines the immediate management pathway. Biomarker results should never delay reperfusion in suspected STEMI.1
2. Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction
The international expert consensus document published in 2018 by the joint cardiology task force provides the current standard definitions for myocardial infarction and myocardial injury.4
2.1 Myocardial Injury vs. Myocardial Infarction
Myocardial injury is defined as detection of an elevated cardiac troponin value above the 99th percentile upper reference limit (URL). Injury is considered acute if there is a rise and/or fall of troponin values.
Myocardial infarction is a specific subset of myocardial injury in which the acute injury occurs in a clinical context consistent with acute myocardial ischemia. The diagnosis of MI requires:4
Detection of a rise and/or fall of cardiac troponin (cTn) with at least one value above the 99th percentile URL AND at least one of the following:
- Symptoms of acute myocardial ischemia
- New ischemic ECG changes
- Development of pathological Q waves
- Imaging evidence of new loss of viable myocardium or new regional wall motion abnormality in a pattern consistent with an ischemic etiology
- Identification of a coronary thrombus by angiography or autopsy (not for Types 2 or 3)
2.2 Five Types of Myocardial Infarction
| Type | Name | Mechanism | Key Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type 1 | Spontaneous MI | Atherothrombotic event — plaque rupture, erosion, fissuring, or dissection causing intraluminal thrombus | The classic ACS presentation; requires rise/fall of cTn + ischemic symptoms/ECG/imaging |
| Type 2 | MI due to supply-demand mismatch | Myocardial oxygen supply-demand imbalance without acute atherothrombosis | Conditions include: coronary spasm, coronary embolism, coronary dissection, sustained tachyarrhythmia, severe bradycardia, respiratory failure, severe anemia, hypo/hypertension, and severe aortic stenosis |
| Type 3 | MI resulting in death before biomarkers available | Fatal MI where death occurs before blood samples for biomarkers could be obtained or before troponin values would be expected to rise | Requires symptoms suggestive of ischemia + presumed new ischemic ECG changes or ventricular fibrillation; biomarkers not available |
| Type 4a | MI related to PCI | MI occurring within 48 hours of PCI | Requires cTn elevation > 5 × 99th percentile URL (if baseline normal) + new ischemic ECG changes, angiographic flow loss, imaging evidence, or new regional wall motion abnormality |
| Type 4b | MI related to stent/scaffold thrombosis | Documented by angiography or autopsy in the setting of myocardial ischemia | Rise and/or fall of cTn with at least one value above 99th percentile URL; classified by timing: acute (0-24h), subacute (>24h to 30d), late (>30d to 1yr), very late (>1yr) |
| Type 4c | MI related to restenosis | In-stent restenosis or restenosis after balloon angioplasty in the infarct territory | No evidence of stent thrombosis; requires cTn elevation > 99th percentile URL |
| Type 5 | MI related to CABG | MI occurring within 48 hours of CABG | Requires cTn elevation > 10 × 99th percentile URL (if baseline normal) + new pathological Q waves or new LBBB, angiographic new graft/native artery occlusion, or imaging evidence of new loss of viable myocardium |
2.3 Type 2 MI — Differential and Clinical Significance
Type 2 MI is frequently encountered in the ED and must be differentiated from Type 1 MI, as the management differs fundamentally. Common triggers of supply-demand mismatch include:4
| Category | Examples |
|---|---|
| Reduced oxygen supply | Severe anemia (Hb < 8 g/dL), hypoxemia (SpO2 < 90%), coronary spasm, coronary embolism, spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) |
| Increased oxygen demand | Sustained tachyarrhythmia (SVT, AF with RVR, VT), severe hypertension, severe aortic stenosis, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, thyrotoxicosis, pheochromocytoma |
| Both | Sepsis, shock, massive pulmonary embolism, respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation |
Key clinical point: Type 2 MI treatment is directed at correcting the underlying supply-demand mismatch, not routine ACS pharmacotherapy. However, patients with known coronary artery disease who develop Type 2 MI may benefit from some ACS therapies on a case-by-case basis.4
3. Pathophysiology of Acute Coronary Syndromes
3.1 Plaque Rupture
The most common mechanism of Type 1 MI, accounting for approximately 60-70% of fatal coronary thrombi. Plaque rupture involves disruption of a thin fibrous cap (typically < 65 micrometers) overlying a lipid-rich necrotic core, exposing thrombogenic material to the bloodstream. Key features of the “vulnerable plaque”:5
- Thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) with fibrous cap < 65 micrometers
- Large lipid-rich necrotic core (> 40% of plaque area)
- Increased macrophage infiltration and inflammatory activity
- Reduced smooth muscle cell density in the cap
- Positive (outward) remodeling
- Neovascularization from the vasa vasorum
3.2 Plaque Erosion
Accounts for approximately 25-35% of ACS events. The fibrous cap remains intact, but endothelial denudation or dysfunction leads to superimposed thrombosis. Plaque erosion is more common in:5
- Younger patients (especially women < 50 years)
- Smokers
- Patients with less severe underlying stenosis
- Plaques rich in proteoglycans and smooth muscle cells rather than lipid
3.3 Other Mechanisms
| Mechanism | Prevalence | Clinical Context |
|---|---|---|
| Calcified nodule | ~5% of ACS | Erosion through fibrous cap by protruding calcified nodule; older patients with heavily calcified vessels |
| Spontaneous coronary dissection (SCAD) | 1-4% of ACS overall; up to 35% in women < 50 years | Intimal tear or vasa vasorum hemorrhage; associated with fibromuscular dysplasia, pregnancy/postpartum, connective tissue disorders |
| Coronary spasm (Prinzmetal) | Variable | Transient vasoconstriction causing complete or near-complete occlusion; often nocturnal/early morning; provoked by smoking, cocaine, cold |
| Coronary embolism | Rare | Sources: left atrial thrombus (AF), prosthetic valve, endocarditis, paradoxical embolism (PFO) |
3.4 Thrombosis Cascade in ACS
Following plaque disruption, the thrombotic cascade proceeds through two overlapping phases:
- Primary hemostasis: Platelet adhesion (via GP Ib/IX/V binding to von Willebrand factor on exposed collagen) → platelet activation (via ADP, thromboxane A2, thrombin) → platelet aggregation (via GP IIb/IIIa binding to fibrinogen)
- Secondary hemostasis: Tissue factor exposure activates the coagulation cascade → thrombin generation → fibrin formation → stabilized fibrin-platelet thrombus
This pathophysiology provides the rationale for dual antiplatelet therapy (blocking platelet activation and aggregation) and anticoagulation (inhibiting thrombin generation) in ACS management.1 2
4. Initial Emergency Department Evaluation
4.1 Prehospital Care
- 12-lead ECG: Should be acquired in the field within 10 minutes of EMS contact for patients with symptoms suggestive of ACS1
- Prehospital STEMI activation: When field ECG demonstrates STEMI, the receiving cardiac catheterization laboratory should be activated while in transit to minimize door-to-balloon time
- Aspirin: Chewable aspirin 162-325 mg should be administered as soon as ACS is suspected (unless true aspirin allergy)1
- Nitroglycerin: Sublingual nitroglycerin 0.4 mg every 5 minutes (up to 3 doses) for ongoing chest pain; avoid if systolic BP < 90 mmHg, severe aortic stenosis, or recent phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor use (sildenafil/vardenafil within 24 hours; tadalafil within 48 hours)1
- Transport destination: Patients with STEMI should be transported directly to a PCI-capable facility when the anticipated first medical contact-to-device time is ≤ 120 minutes1
4.2 Focused History
The initial history should be rapidly obtained and should include:6
| Element | Key Assessments |
|---|---|
| Symptom characterization | Location, quality, severity, duration, radiation, onset (sudden vs. gradual), exacerbating/relieving factors, associated symptoms (dyspnea, diaphoresis, nausea, syncope) |
| Chest pain typicality | Typical angina: substernal pressure/tightness with exertional provocation and relief with rest/nitroglycerin. Atypical features more common in women, elderly, diabetics: jaw/neck/arm/epigastric pain, isolated dyspnea, nausea/vomiting, fatigue |
| Timing and duration | Ongoing vs. resolved; duration of current episode; any prior similar episodes |
| Cardiovascular risk factors | Hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, smoking, family history of premature CAD (male first-degree relative < 55 years, female < 65 years), obesity, prior known CAD |
| Prior cardiac history | Prior MI, PCI, CABG, prior catheterization results, known coronary anatomy, prior stress testing |
| Current medications | Antiplatelet agents, anticoagulants, beta-blockers, nitrates, statins, antihypertensives |
| Contraindications screen | Bleeding history, prior stroke, recent surgery/trauma, active peptic ulcer disease, pregnancy, known bleeding diathesis — critical for fibrinolytic eligibility |
| Substance use | Cocaine, methamphetamine (important for management decisions) |
4.3 Physical Examination
The physical examination in suspected ACS serves three purposes: (1) identify hemodynamic compromise, (2) detect complications, and (3) evaluate for alternative diagnoses.1 2
| System | Key Findings | Clinical Significance |
|---|---|---|
| General | Diaphoresis, pallor, anxiety, distress | Suggests significant ischemia/hemodynamic compromise |
| Vital signs | Hypotension, tachycardia, bradycardia, tachypnea, hypoxia | Hypotension + inferior STEMI → consider RV infarction; bradycardia → vagal response or conduction disease |
| Neck | JVD | Right heart failure, RV infarction, cardiac tamponade (from free wall rupture) |
| Cardiovascular | S3 gallop, new systolic murmur, muffled heart sounds, pericardial friction rub | S3 → LV dysfunction; new murmur → acute MR (papillary muscle dysfunction/rupture) or VSD; muffled + JVD + hypotension → tamponade |
| Pulmonary | Crackles/rales | Pulmonary edema from LV dysfunction; Killip classification |
| Extremities | Cool/mottled, peripheral edema, diminished pulses | Cardiogenic shock, peripheral vascular disease (access considerations for PCI), aortic dissection (pulse differential) |
| Abdomen | Aortic pulsatile mass, epigastric tenderness | Alternative diagnosis (AAA, PUD); hepatic congestion in RV failure |
4.4 Killip Classification
The Killip classification is assessed on initial presentation and provides important prognostic information:1
| Killip Class | Clinical Findings | Approximate In-Hospital Mortality (Contemporary Data) |
|---|---|---|
| I | No heart failure | 3-5% |
| II | Mild heart failure: S3 gallop, basilar rales, jugular venous distension | 5-12% |
| III | Pulmonary edema | 10-20% |
| IV | Cardiogenic shock: systolic BP < 90 mmHg with signs of hypoperfusion | 40-60% |
4.5 Differential Diagnosis of Acute Chest Pain
| Category | Diagnoses | Key Distinguishing Features |
|---|---|---|
| Cardiovascular — life-threatening | Acute aortic dissection, pulmonary embolism, cardiac tamponade | Dissection: tearing pain, pulse deficit, widened mediastinum; PE: pleuritic pain, dyspnea, DVT risk factors; Tamponade: Beck triad |
| Cardiovascular — other | Myocarditis, pericarditis, takotsubo cardiomyopathy, stable angina | Pericarditis: pleuritic, positional, diffuse ST elevation with PR depression; Takotsubo: post-emotional/physical stress, apical ballooning |
| Pulmonary | Tension pneumothorax, pneumonia, pleuritis | Pneumothorax: sudden pleuritic pain, absent breath sounds; Pneumonia: fever, productive cough |
| Gastrointestinal | Esophageal rupture (Boerhaave), esophageal spasm, PUD, cholecystitis, pancreatitis | Boerhaave: post-emesis, subcutaneous emphysema; Spasm: may mimic angina, responds to nitroglycerin |
| Musculoskeletal | Costochondritis, rib fracture, muscle strain | Reproducible with palpation (though this does NOT exclude ACS — up to 6% of MI patients have reproducible chest wall tenderness) |
| Other | Herpes zoster, anxiety/panic | Zoster: dermatomal vesicular rash; Anxiety: diagnosis of exclusion |
5. The 12-Lead ECG in Acute Coronary Syndromes
5.1 ECG Acquisition Standards
- A 12-lead ECG must be acquired and interpreted within 10 minutes of ED arrival for any patient with symptoms suggestive of ACS1 7
- If the initial ECG is non-diagnostic but clinical suspicion remains high, serial ECGs should be obtained at 15-30 minute intervals during the first 1-2 hours6
- Right-sided leads (V3R, V4R) should be obtained when inferior STEMI is identified to assess for right ventricular involvement1
- Posterior leads (V7, V8, V9) should be obtained when there is ST depression in V1-V3 (suspected posterior MI) or when clinical suspicion for ACS is high despite a non-diagnostic standard 12-lead ECG1
5.2 STEMI Criteria — ST-Segment Elevation
The diagnosis of STEMI requires new ST elevation at the J point in at least two contiguous leads meeting the following voltage criteria:1 4
| Lead Group | Voltage Criteria for ST Elevation |
|---|---|
| V2-V3 in men ≥ 40 years | ≥ 2.0 mm (0.2 mV) |
| V2-V3 in men < 40 years | ≥ 2.5 mm (0.25 mV) |
| V2-V3 in women (all ages) | ≥ 1.5 mm (0.15 mV) |
| All other leads (V1, V4-V6, I, aVL, II, III, aVF) | ≥ 1.0 mm (0.1 mV) |
| V7-V9 (posterior leads) | ≥ 0.5 mm (0.05 mV) |
| V3R, V4R (right-sided leads) | ≥ 0.5 mm (0.05 mV); ≥ 1.0 mm in men < 30 years |
5.3 STEMI Localization by ECG Leads
| ECG Territory | Leads with ST Elevation | Reciprocal ST Depression | Culprit Artery (Most Common) | Complications to Anticipate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anterior | V1-V4 | II, III, aVF | Left anterior descending (LAD) | LV dysfunction, heart failure, cardiogenic shock, VT/VF |
| Extensive anterior (anterolateral) | V1-V6, I, aVL | II, III, aVF | Proximal LAD (before S1 and D1) | Large infarct size, cardiogenic shock, free wall rupture, VSD |
| Lateral | I, aVL, V5-V6 | II, III, aVF | Left circumflex (LCx) or diagonal branch of LAD | Usually moderate infarct size |
| High lateral | I, aVL | II, III, aVF | First diagonal branch (D1) or obtuse marginal (OM) | May be missed if only V1-V6 reviewed without attention to limb leads |
| Inferior | II, III, aVF | I, aVL | Right coronary artery (RCA) ~85%; LCx ~15% | Bradycardia (AV block), RV infarction, hypotension |
| Inferolateral | II, III, aVF, V5-V6, I, aVL | V1-V3 | Large LCx or co-dominant system | Larger infarct territory |
| Posterior | V7-V9 (ST elevation ≥ 0.5 mm) | V1-V3 (tall R waves, ST depression, upright T waves — “mirror image”) | LCx or posterior descending artery (PDA) | Often missed on standard 12-lead; always obtain posterior leads if V1-V3 depression |
| Right ventricular | V3R-V6R (especially V4R) | — | Proximal RCA (before RV marginal branches) | Hypotension, volume sensitivity, avoid nitrates/diuretics, AV block |
| Inferoposterior | II, III, aVF + V7-V9 | V1-V3 | RCA or LCx | Combined territory — higher risk |
5.4 STEMI Equivalents
These ECG patterns represent acute coronary occlusion (or near-occlusion) requiring emergent reperfusion despite not meeting classic STEMI voltage criteria. Recognition of these patterns is critical and should trigger the same time-urgent response as STEMI.7 8
5.4.1 De Winter Pattern
- Description: Tall, symmetric, peaked T waves with 1-3 mm upsloping ST depression at the J point in precordial leads (V1-V6), often with subtle ST elevation in aVR
- Significance: Represents acute LAD occlusion equivalent to anterior STEMI; present in approximately 2% of acute LAD occlusions
- Management: Emergent catheterization/PCI (treat as STEMI equivalent)8
- Key distinguishing features: The ST depression is upsloping (not horizontal or downsloping as in typical subendocardial ischemia), and the T waves are tall, symmetric, and hyperacute
5.4.2 Wellens Syndrome
- Description: Biphasic (Type A) or deeply inverted (Type B) T waves in V2-V3, occurring during a pain-free interval in patients with recent anginal symptoms
- Pattern A: Biphasic T waves (initially positive, then negative) in V2-V3 — ~25% of cases
- Pattern B: Deep, symmetric T-wave inversions in V2-V3 (may extend to V1-V6) — ~75% of cases
- Significance: Indicates critical proximal LAD stenosis with high risk of imminent extensive anterior MI
- Management: Avoid stress testing (high risk of precipitating infarction). Refer for cardiac catheterization. These patients require revascularization, not a stress test.8
- Key ECG criteria: Minimal or no ST elevation, no precordial Q waves, preserved R-wave progression, normal or minimally elevated troponin at time of ECG (the pattern appears during reperfusion/pain-free intervals)
5.4.3 Posterior STEMI (Isolated Posterior MI)
- Standard 12-lead clues: ST depression in V1-V3 with tall, broad R waves in V1-V2 (R/S ratio > 1), upright T waves in V1-V3
- Posterior leads: ST elevation ≥ 0.5 mm in V7-V9 confirms the diagnosis
- Significance: Represents acute occlusion of the LCx or PDA; occurs in approximately 3-11% of all acute MI; frequently missed because the standard 12-lead ECG does not directly record posterior electrical activity1
- Management: Emergent reperfusion (same as STEMI). The international cardiology guidelines committee and the emergency cardiology expert panel both recommend posterior lead acquisition in any patient with ST depression isolated to V1-V31 7
5.4.4 Sgarbossa Criteria (STEMI in the Setting of Left Bundle Branch Block)
In patients with LBBB, the expected baseline ST-T changes make STEMI diagnosis challenging. The modified Sgarbossa criteria (Smith modification) improve diagnostic accuracy:9
| Criterion | Original Sgarbossa Score | Modified (Smith) Criterion |
|---|---|---|
| Concordant ST elevation ≥ 1 mm in any lead with a positive (upright) QRS complex | 5 points | Same — most specific criterion |
| Concordant ST depression ≥ 1 mm in V1, V2, or V3 | 3 points | Same |
| Excessively discordant ST elevation | ≥ 5 mm of ST elevation in leads with a negative QRS (original — 2 points) | ST elevation / S-wave amplitude ratio ≥ 0.25 (Smith modification — replaces the original 5 mm absolute criterion) |
Interpretation:
- Original Sgarbossa: Score ≥ 3 is highly specific (approximately 90%) for STEMI in LBBB, but sensitivity is low (~36%)
- Modified Sgarbossa (Smith): Replacing the absolute 5 mm criterion with the proportional 0.25 ratio improves sensitivity to approximately 91% while maintaining specificity around 90%9
- Clinical application: New or presumably new LBBB alone is no longer considered a STEMI equivalent per updated guidelines. The presence of ischemic symptoms PLUS positive modified Sgarbossa criteria should trigger emergent reperfusion.7
5.4.5 Sgarbossa Criteria in Ventricular Paced Rhythm
The same modified Sgarbossa criteria can be applied to patients with ventricular paced rhythms (which produce an LBBB-like pattern). The concordance/discordance rules are identical:9
- Concordant ST elevation ≥ 1 mm: highly specific for acute MI
- Concordant ST depression ≥ 1 mm in V1-V3: highly specific for acute MI
- Excessive discordant ST elevation (ST/S ratio ≥ 0.25): sensitive and specific
5.4.6 Isolated ST Elevation in aVR
- Pattern: ST elevation in aVR ≥ 1 mm with diffuse ST depression in multiple other leads (≥ 6 leads)
- Significance: Suggests left main coronary artery (LMCA) occlusion or severe three-vessel disease with diffuse subendocardial ischemia
- Clinical context: The degree of ST elevation in aVR relative to ST elevation in V1 may help differentiate LMCA (aVR > V1) from proximal LAD (V1 > aVR) occlusion
- Management: Emergent cardiology consultation and catheterization; these patients are at extremely high risk for cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest7
6. Right Ventricular Myocardial Infarction
6.1 Epidemiology and Pathophysiology
Right ventricular (RV) infarction occurs in approximately 30-50% of inferior STEMIs and results from occlusion of the proximal RCA (before the RV marginal branches). Isolated RV infarction is rare. The hemodynamic consequences are distinct from LV infarction and require specific management.1 10
6.2 Diagnosis
| Diagnostic Method | Findings |
|---|---|
| ECG (right-sided leads) | ST elevation ≥ 1 mm (≥ 0.5 mm in V5R-V6R) in V3R and V4R; V4R ST elevation ≥ 1 mm is the most sensitive and specific single criterion (sensitivity ~88%, specificity ~78%) |
| Clinical triad | Hypotension + clear lung fields + elevated JVP (present in ~25% of patients with RV MI) |
| Kussmaul sign | Paradoxical rise in JVP with inspiration (indicates impaired RV filling) |
| Echocardiography | RV dilation, RV free wall hypokinesis/akinesis, interventricular septum bowing toward LV, dilated IVC without inspiratory collapse |
6.3 Hemodynamic Consequences
The infarcted RV is unable to generate adequate preload for the LV. Cardiac output becomes highly preload-dependent. Key hemodynamic features:
- Elevated right atrial pressure (RAP) with RAP/PCWP ratio ≥ 0.8
- Low or normal pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP)
- Low cardiac output
- Equalization of diastolic pressures (RAP ≈ RV diastolic pressure ≈ PCWP) — may mimic constrictive pericarditis or tamponade
6.4 Management Principles for RV Infarction
| Intervention | Rationale |
|---|---|
| Volume loading | Initial bolus of 250-500 mL normal saline; repeat as needed targeting adequate LV preload; RV is preload-dependent |
| Avoid nitrates | Nitroglycerin reduces preload and can cause severe hypotension |
| Avoid diuretics | Reduce preload and worsen hypotension |
| Avoid morphine | Venodilation reduces preload (use with extreme caution if at all) |
| Maintain AV synchrony | Loss of atrial kick (AF, high-grade AV block) is poorly tolerated; temporary pacing (AV sequential preferred) may be required |
| Inotropic support | Dobutamine (2-20 mcg/kg/min) if volume loading fails to restore adequate cardiac output |
| Emergent reperfusion | Primary PCI is the preferred strategy; RV function often recovers significantly after successful reperfusion of the RCA |
7. ECG Pitfalls and Special Considerations
7.1 Conditions That May Mimic STEMI on ECG
| Condition | ECG Pattern | Key Distinguishing Features |
|---|---|---|
| Acute pericarditis | Diffuse ST elevation (concave up) + PR depression | Diffuse (not territorial) distribution; PR depression in most leads; PR elevation in aVR; absence of reciprocal changes; clinical context (fever, pleuritic pain, friction rub) |
| Left ventricular hypertrophy | ST elevation in V1-V3 with tall QRS voltages | Typically discordant (ST elevation in leads with deep S waves); meets voltage criteria for LVH; strain pattern |
| Left bundle branch block | Discordant ST changes | Baseline LBBB produces expected ST-T changes discordant to QRS; apply modified Sgarbossa criteria |
| Brugada syndrome | Coved ST elevation in V1-V3 | Type 1 (coved): ≥ 2 mm ST elevation with negative T wave in V1-V2; history of syncope, family history of sudden death |
| Early repolarization (benign) | Concave ST elevation, often V2-V5 | Notched/slurred J point; concordant T waves; most common in young males; absence of reciprocal changes |
| Takotsubo cardiomyopathy | ST elevation (often anterior leads) | Post-emotional/physical stress; predominantly postmenopausal women; apical ballooning on imaging; coronary angiography shows non-obstructive coronaries |
| Hyperkalemia | Peaked T waves, widened QRS, may simulate STEMI | Clinical context (renal failure, medications); tall peaked T waves often precede ST changes |
| Ventricular aneurysm | Persistent ST elevation (usually anterior) | History of prior anterior MI; persistent elevation > 2 weeks post-MI; no reciprocal changes; no evolution of ST changes |
7.2 Normal-ECG ACS
Approximately 1-6% of patients with acute MI have a completely normal initial ECG. Therefore:6
- A normal ECG does not exclude ACS
- Serial ECGs and troponin testing are essential when clinical suspicion is present
- Clinical risk stratification tools (HEART score) should be applied to guide disposition
7.3 Dynamic ECG Changes
Serial ECG monitoring may reveal evolving changes not present on the initial tracing. Key dynamic patterns include:
- Intermittent ST elevation (suggesting intermittent occlusion/reperfusion)
- Progressive ST depression or T-wave inversions
- New conduction abnormalities (new LBBB, fascicular blocks, AV block)
- Resolution of ST elevation (may indicate spontaneous reperfusion — important for timing of intervention)
References
O’Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al. “2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.” Circulation. 2013;127(4):e362-e425. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182742cf6 ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎
Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. “2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes.” Circulation. 2014;130(25):e344-e426. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000134 ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎
Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. “2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes.” Eur Heart J. 2023;44(38):3720-3826. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad191 ↩︎
Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. “Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018).” Circulation. 2018;138(20):e618-e651. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000617 ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎
Libby P. “Mechanisms of Acute Coronary Syndromes and Their Implications for Therapy.” N Engl J Med. 2013;368(21):2004-2013. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra1216063 ↩︎ ↩︎
Gulati M, Levy PD, Mukherjee D, et al. “2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain.” Circulation. 2021;144(22):e588-e637. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001029 ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎
Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, et al. “2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation.” Eur Heart J. 2018;39(2):119-177. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393 ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎
de Winter RJ, Verouden NJ, Wellens HJ, et al. “A new ECG sign of proximal LAD occlusion.” N Engl J Med. 2008;359(19):2071-2073. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc0804737 ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎
Smith SW, Dodd KW, Henry TD, et al. “Diagnosis of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the Presence of Left Bundle Branch Block With the ST-Elevation to S-Wave Ratio in a Modified Sgarbossa Rule.” Ann Emerg Med. 2012;60(6):766-776. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.07.119 ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎
Mehta SR, Eikelboom JW, Natarajan MK, et al. “Impact of right ventricular involvement on mortality and morbidity in patients with inferior myocardial infarction.” J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37(1):37-43. DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)01089-5 ↩︎